<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inside Pulse TV &#187; Heroes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tv.insidepulse.com/category/shows/heroes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com</link>
	<description>Whether the shows are on network, cable or even premium channels like HBO or SHOWTIME, our outspoken staff will to tell you what you’re missing, what you should try out and what’s not worth your time. Whether your life is just as dramatic or not at all - PrimeTime Pulse is your place.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:01:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Heroes - Episode 4-18 Review</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2010/02/09/heroes-episode-4-18-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2010/02/09/heroes-episode-4-18-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=179328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m going to say this, but I think Heroes was better than 24 this week.  And, like, by a pretty large margin as well.  Even I&#8217;m surprised to say this, considering how lackluster this season has been, but this may have been their best finale yet.  And truth be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m going to say this, but I think <em>Heroes </em>was better than <em>24 </em>this week.  And, like, by a pretty large margin as well.  Even I&#8217;m surprised to say this, considering how lackluster this season has been, but this may have been their best finale yet.  And truth be told, if that&#8217;s where things are headed, this episode provided a suitable and somewhat satisfying conclusion to the series.</p>
<p>You have Peter at peace with his brother&#8217;s death, Sylar turning a corner and becoming an unexpected hero, Tracy achieving true redemption, Hiro fulfilling his quest (in a rather selfless way, incidentally) and doing something truly heroic &#8212; which would not have been possible without Ando&#8217;s ability, HRG and Claire coming to an understanding about their complex relationship, and the ushering in a brave new world in which those with abilities are now out in the open.  And, in a rarity for this series, they actually SHOWED us an epic battle.  The characters were all used pretty perfectly as well, with &#8220;minor&#8221; characters like Tracy and Parkman appearing minimally, and unnecessary characters like Mohinder being absent altogether.  This allowed the major characters to all play crucial and individually heroic roles:  Claire and HRG stopped Samuel, Peter fought him, Hiro and Ando weakened him, Sylar fought Doyle, etc.  I&#8217;m pretty impressed, to be honest.</p>
<p>This episode also did a surprisingly fantastic job of bringing all of the central characters together for the big battle at the carnival.  And, much like the first season finale (which understandably set the bar), it didn&#8217;t come off as contrived  or forced.  And, come to think of it, the remaining finales lacked that feeling of all of the characters banding together to take on the big bad.  The conclusions of the other volumes came off as disjointed and disconnected &#8212; a poor maneuver for a show that finds its strength in connecting their central cast.</p>
<p>To tell you the truth, the only thing I took issue with was Claire&#8217;s reveal at the end.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I loved the allusions to season one, with HRG saying that Claire is breaking his heart by exhibiting her powers on tape (although I did appreciate that he didn&#8217;t physically attempt to stop her &#8212; this showed a certain amount of growth in their relationship), and Claire&#8217;s &#8220;this is attempt number&#8230;&#8221; comment.  I just felt like the scene was played out in an overall lazy and unrealistic manner.  I mean, after all that destruction, wouldn&#8217;t there be a whole lot of rescue workers around?  You know, cops and firefighters and such?  And these people would just sit back in awe as some young woman climbs up a Ferris wheel?  And yes, I know we&#8217;re supposed to believe that television journalists are ratings hungry monsters, but I still find it difficult to swallow that they&#8217;d just watch and instruct their cameramen to keep the camera on her as she attempts something so dangerous and life threatening.  I understand what they were going for &#8212; and to a large extent it worked &#8212; but there were better ways to go around it than having a group of adults following her and just watching as she climbs to the top of a Ferris wheel.</p>
<p>Let me touch upon a few of the other things that happened in the episode:</p>
<p>I mentioned this in an earlier column, but I really loved seeing HRG and Claire fight side by side.  By the end of each season they&#8217;re most certainly on the same side, but we&#8217;ve never really literally seen them fight together.  Compare this finale to season one, where HRG did everything he could to keep Claire away from such dangerous situations.  Now, he&#8217;s giving her orders to split up so that they can face their enemy from both sides.  It really does show how far they&#8217;ve come.  Plus, I&#8217;m a sucker for seeing these two together.  One thing I will say:  I am grateful that the writers relented on forcing their petty differences.  Sure, they had their conflicts this year, but their issues had a certain maturity to them that was lacking in previous years.</p>
<p>I was satisfied with how they ended the Charlie/Hiro story.  It was a good way of ending it happily, while still making Hiro look selfless.  And I must say, that was an absolutely wonderful casting decision.  The wide, dark eyes and big smile really captured the character &#8212; I easily believed that could be Charlie in 65 years.</p>
<p>Finally, I&#8217;m glad they decided to stay the course with Sylar as a reformed &#8220;good guy.&#8221;  This character has been all over the place since season three &#8212; and especially this season, come to think of it &#8212; that yet another turn would have made the character unsalvagable, in my opinion.  And it certainly would have showed that the writers have no clue what to do with him.</p>
<p>Now, one has to wonder, though:  Does an awesome finale make up for a lackluster season?  Unfortunately, I do not believe so.  And in that regard, this episode failed in a major way:  While I do have many, many fine things to say about the finale, it doesn&#8217;t really leave me psyched for the next season.  And while I&#8217;d like to see the show continue, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d be devastated if it didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p><strong>Matt Basilo has been writing for Inside Pulse since April 2005, providing his insight into popular television shows such as Lost, 24, Heroes, and Smallville. Be sure to visit his blog at <a href="http://acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">[a case of the blog]</a> and follow him on <a href="http://twitter.com/acaseofthetwit">Twitter</a>.</strong><br />
<topstory120x120>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/HeroesLogo.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory500x250>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/heroes_cheerleader500&#215;250.jpg</topstory500x250></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2010/02/09/heroes-episode-4-18-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes - Episode 4-17 Review</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2010/02/02/heroes-episode-4-17-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2010/02/02/heroes-episode-4-17-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=179040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to thank those readers who commented on last week&#8217;s column and correctly pointed out to me that Parkman didn&#8217;t actually block Sylar&#8217;s abilities &#8212; he merely trapped him in his own subconscious, in a world in which he didn&#8217;t have abilities.  Thanks for the info!
So next week is the season finale (the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to thank those readers who commented on last week&#8217;s column and correctly pointed out to me that Parkman didn&#8217;t actually block Sylar&#8217;s abilities &#8212; he merely trapped him in his own subconscious, in a world in which he didn&#8217;t have abilities.  Thanks for the info!</p>
<p>So next week is the season finale (the season was shortended for the Winter Olympics) and I have to admit, I&#8217;m a little relieved.  It&#8217;s not even that I need a bit of a breather from the show, it&#8217;s more that Monday is already a big TV night for me, and with <em>Lost </em>returning on Tuesdays, I just don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll have the energy to do all these reviews in two days.  I&#8217;m relatively optimistic that they&#8217;ll get a fifth season, so I&#8217;d like the writers to just put some real consideration of where they want to take the show next season (which I do think would be its last), because I have to say, this was one of the most schizophrenic episodes of <em>Heroes </em>in recent history.  The episode was just all over the place in every sense of the way:  my personal overall enjoyment, character histories and motivations, etc.</p>
<p>Case in point:  When the episode began, I thought the Claire/HRG arc was far more interesting than the Peter/Sylar dreamworld (shocker).  Yet, by the end of the episode, I was actually enjoying the Sylar/Peter portion more.</p>
<p>I thought the Bennet stuff started off really, really strong.  I tend to dislike any form of rewriting a character&#8217;s history (I hate it every time they do it with Sylar, and I disliked it when Lauren was senselessly nudged into HRG&#8217;s past), but I actually had no issue with the revelation that HRG had a &#8220;past life&#8221; where he was happy, honest, married, and expecting his first child.  I appreciated the fact that he lacked the killer instinct that he&#8217;s now known for, and I though it was clever how his wife&#8217;s seemingly random murder hardened him and set him on his current path.  And I absolutely loved Claire&#8217;s sympathetic, mature reaction to this news.  At first it wasn&#8217;t explicit, you could just tell that, to Claire, this was merely a part of her father&#8217;s past that he couldn&#8217;t tell her about.  And you could genuinely sense that she trusted that there was some reason why he never told her.  I really liked how she resisted learning more, insisting that this is his business, not hers.  For the first time, she seemed to understand that her father is entitled to the same privacy any teenager or young adult demands.  And after the scene played out, and we understood the tragic end, I actually thought it was nice that they had Claire verbally express what she had sensed &#8212; simply that this was a place her father couldn&#8217;t go emotionally.</p>
<p>And then, it all sorta fell apart.  I absolutely hated how angrily she responded to HRG&#8217;s first kill.  It was quite obvious that he was emotionally fragile, and his actions were so clearly self defense, as well.  Out of all the things she&#8217;s seen him do, THIS is the thing she gets upset about?  Considering what she had seen him go through, you&#8217;d think she&#8217;d understand him a little better.  It felt like we had made so much progress, and then, out of nowhere, we&#8217;re jumping back to their midseason one relationship.</p>
<p>I was even more bothered by the discovery that The Company had seemingly arranged HRG&#8217;s family man persona.  Sure, HRG claims that he truly loved Sandra &#8212; and I can even believe that &#8212; but I thought his &#8220;I chose your mother&#8221; argument was a lit empty.  I mean, Thompson literally said to him, &#8220;the waitress will do.&#8221;  And bam, that&#8217;s who he married.  I have no doubt he eventually came to love her, but that was most definitely an &#8220;arranged marriage.&#8221;</p>
<p>And, to me, that really damaged his character.  Heroes has a nasty tendency of trying to make their characters more complex than they actually are (hence why we can&#8217;t have Sylar just be a villain), but HRG was one of the only legitimately deep and layered characters.  Part of the reason why he became so popular was because he was this arguably violent, dangerous man who is doing morally questionable things &#8212; yet he&#8217;s got this deep love and devotion to his family.  The idea that this aspect of his life began as a work-related agreement cheapens that.</p>
<p>That being said, they did pick things up (a bit) in the end, with Claire showing that she&#8217;s not completely daft and revealing that she didn&#8217;t fall for Samuel&#8217;s manipulation.  I actually did like the way she delivered her &#8220;did you really think I was going to turn on him?&#8221; line.</p>
<p>I initially found the story with Peter and Sylar frustrating.  Sylar&#8217;s character, like this episode, is just out of control all over the place.  It seems like his motivations are being rewritten by the episode.  Honestly, this season alone he&#8217;s gone from bad to good to bad to good to bad to unsure.  For the life of me, I just don&#8217;t understand why they won&#8217;t have him be the villain he was conceived as.  Or, if they&#8217;re determined to have him be a hero, why they just didn&#8217;t go with it last season.</p>
<p>I did think the dream world was a clever way of giving a reasonable explanation as to how Peter could possibly forgive Sylar for all he had done.  It was reminiscent of <em>The 4400</em>, where Tom and Alana lived in a dream world that, for them, lasted many years &#8212; but to the outside world was mere second &#8212; resulting in them developing a deep relationship.  Same deal with Peter and Sylar.  They lived in a world where it was only the two of them, and they were really forced to rely on each other for their own survival and sanity.  And they weren&#8217;t able to escape that world until both of them let down their guard and truly forgave and trusted each other.</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s the deal, <em>Heroes</em> writers:  You made your bed.  Sylar is now a hero.  You&#8217;ve made your decision, so don&#8217;t end the season with him suddenly going bad again.  And to the characters of the show:  To that end, for the love of God, don&#8217;t let him rent a car!</p>
<p><strong>Matt Basilo has been writing for Inside Pulse since April 2005, providing his insight into popular television shows such as Lost, 24, Heroes, and Smallville. Be sure to visit his blog at <a href="http://acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">[a case of the blog]</a> and follow him on <a href="http://twitter.com/acaseofthetwit">Twitter</a>.</strong><br />
<topstory120x120>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/HeroesLogo.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory500x250>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/heroes_cheerleader500&#215;250.jpg</topstory500x250></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2010/02/02/heroes-episode-4-17-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes - Episode 4-16 Review</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2010/01/26/heroes-episode-4-16-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2010/01/26/heroes-episode-4-16-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=178703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I have to admit that I was initially going to hold off on watching Heroes until Tuesday, but I follow Greg Grunberg on Twitter and he kept posting Tweets and Re-Tweets about how incredible the episode was and my curiosity got the best of me, so I decided to plop down at midnight and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I have to admit that I was initially going to hold off on watching <em>Heroes</em> until Tuesday, but I follow Greg Grunberg on Twitter and he kept posting Tweets and Re-Tweets about how incredible the episode was and my curiosity got the best of me, so I decided to plop down at midnight and watch the episode.  While it wasn’t bad, I think I would have preferred the extra hour of sleep.</p>
<p>Now, it’s important to me that I don’t give off the false impression that I no longer enjoy this show, because I do.  Yes, it can be immensely frustrating, but I still care about a lot of the characters and I’d still like for the show to succeed.  So let’s start off with some of the positives.</p>
<p>First and foremost, there was no Hiro, Ando, or Mohinder.  That’s a victory in and of itself!  Okay, okay, that was a little cheap.  That sounded more like a backhanded compliment.  But actually, with such a large, ensemble cast – with a group of characters that are not necessarily used every episode – sometimes it is a gift to know which characters to focus on and which ones to put on the backburner, if momentarily.  And, for the most part, I think they made some wise decisions here.</p>
<p>I was initially skeptical with the Claire/HRG thing, especially when I saw previews.  I shuddered when I saw Claire warning Lydia about her dad’s impending attack.  I’m thinking, “Really?  She’s siding with the Carnival over her father?”  But it was actually a rather noble thing for Claire to do.  She agreed that Samuel needed to pay for what he had done, but she recognized that it could turn into a bloodbath (showing more maturity and rationality than her father, arguably), and she was looking to protect the innocent (the bystanders at the Carnival) and those she cares about (her father).  So, I didn’t mind her warning.  And I found her attempt to arrange a peaceful hand-off inoffensive.  Actually, this was a somewhat clever way of handling their reconciliation.</p>
<p>I was also worried that they’d have Claire once again distrust her father by believing that he was responsible for the Carnival shoot out.  Trust me when I say that there was a huge sigh of relief when she rightly figured out that he was being set up.  And, again, this did a nice job of drawing some distinct battle lines.  It’s now Claire and HRG against Samuel and his minions.  And it’s kinda funny, but I don’t recall us ever truly seeing HRG and Claire literally fighting side-by-side.</p>
<p>Oh, and I absolutely LOVED that HRG had instructed Lauren to call Tracy if anything went wrong.  I’m so glad that they didn’t completely forget about that relationship.  It’s actually rather too bad, because this is the first time, like, EVER that any of Ali Larter’s characters have been interesting…and instead of going with it, they needlessly introduced a new character.</p>
<p>So yeah, it’s actually HRG, Claire, Lauren, and Tracy….not too shabby.</p>
<p>I really want to give the writers credit for this, so I might as well give them the benefit of the doubt here.  It’s my interpretation that they weren’t trying to go for any shocking twist when the shootout began.  I think they expected the viewers to know HRG wasn’t behind it, and that they’d immediately figure out what this guy was up to.  If that’s the case, nice job, because it did add a fun new level of enjoyment as the scene played out, knowing that he’s getting away with this dangerous manipulation.</p>
<p>My biggest issue with this episode was this concept of Parkman “hiding” Sylar’s abilities somewhere in his mind that he’ll never find them.  First, this is just plain weak.  Secondly, there is a well established (for this show, anyway) precedent that people’s abilities have nothing to do with their memories.  Peter got amnesia at the start of season two, but his powers kept emerging.  Sylar believes he’s Nathan, yet his “Sylar Powers” kept activating.  Even when Sylar had no memory whatsoever, his powers were still apparent (geez, this show is beginning to give <em>Smallville </em>a run for its money with characters getting amnesia).  There’s just no basis for this idea that Parkman can mentally block somebody’s abilities.</p>
<p>Come to think of it, where was the Haitian?  This guy has the ability to (a) erase people’s memories and (b) block people’s powers.  He’s, like, tailor made for this mission.</p>
<p>Oh, I was dying for Sylar to follow through with his threat that he can be very creative with his – if only to finally confirm which abilities he actually still possesses.</p>
<p>I also find the idea that Peter would seek out Sylar’s help INCREDIBLY hard to swallow.  They’ve done a nice job of strengthening Peter’s character over the past two seasons, and I fear that they’re having him take a HUGE step back with this.  Peter had developed into a smarter, more confident person who didn’t blindly follow what others – whether they’re motivated by powers or simply power – told him.  And that includes visions of the future.  With that in mind, I just have a lot of trouble believing that he would turn to Sylar – who he just learned murdered his brother – for any reason whatsoever.  And it’s not even like he attempted to think of a Plan B!  And I’m not counting him breaking the cello!</p>
<p><strong>Matt Basilo has been writing for Inside Pulse since April 2005, providing his insight into popular television shows such as Lost, 24, Heroes, and Smallville. Be sure to visit his blog at <a href="http://acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">[a case of the blog]</a> and follow him on <a href="http://twitter.com/acaseofthetwit">Twitter</a>.</strong><br />
<topstory500x250>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/heroes_cheerleader500&#215;250.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory120x120>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/HeroesLogo.jpg</topstory120x120></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2010/01/26/heroes-episode-4-16-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes - Episode 4-15 Review</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2010/01/19/heroes-episode-4-15-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2010/01/19/heroes-episode-4-15-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=178223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I’ll be honest, Heroes had a pretty uphill climb throughout the episode.  I mean, the episode was pretty evenly split between Sylar finding himself (for the millionth time) and Hiro having delusions (literally, this time) of heroism and grandeur.  Frequent readers must know by now that these are my two favorite subjects. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I’ll be honest, <em>Heroes </em>had a pretty uphill climb throughout the episode.  I mean, the episode was pretty evenly split between Sylar finding himself (for the millionth time) and Hiro having delusions (literally, this time) of heroism and grandeur.  Frequent readers must know by now that these are my two favorite subjects.  Oh, and the Carnival too.</p>
<p>But it was kinda neat seeing David Anders compete with himself, appearing on both <em>Heroes </em>and <em>24</em>.</p>
<p>I suppose I should be fair and admit that, given the topic matter, they did a commendable job.  In fact, I have to applaud them for pointing out some of the erratic and borderline utterly selfish decisions Hiro has made over the past couple of seasons.  Most notably, that he was willing to go against his code AND allow a ruthless killer to walk free in order to save the woman he loves.  They didn’t merely gloss over the parts of the story that don’t conveniently fit into the argument they were attempting to make.  And for that, I commend them.</p>
<p>A lot of his dream sequence was clichéd and cheesy (punishable by…..DEATH!), but I’m going to give them the benefit of the doubt and assume it was purposeful.  As in, this is exactly the sort of scenario Hiro would dream up.  But even that excuse goes so far.  I mean, what the crap was with Ando’s soliloquy?  Honestly, it sounded more like a movie trailer than a man pleading with his best friend to continue fighting.  And for that matter, it’s becoming increasingly obvious that Hiro is descending into such cartoonishness that the boyish charm that made him so popular has all but disappeared.</p>
<p>Another side effect of the episode was that it reminded me of what Sylar SHOULD be.  As I noted in the introduction, we were once again force fed this idea that Sylar is some torn and complex character (it’s gotten so bad that I’m pretty sure even Claire called him Emo).  How many times have we seen this routine?  Damn, how many times have we seen it this very season?  It was so much more enjoyable watching him nonchalantly rattling off all the people he’s killed, without the slightest hint of remorse.  That, on top of his lackadaisical attempt to remember Ted’s last name.  I don’t understand their resistance to just allow him to be THAT character.  The opportunity for him to be a quasi-hero has long past.  I mean, are we supposed to feel bad for him that he doesn’t want to die alone?  Are we supposed to root for him in that regard?  And perhaps most bothersome – his sudden concern over dying alone is a direct response to what Hiro told him in the past, after he saved Charlie.  Therefore, it obviously had a really profound effect on him.  Yet we’re to believe that it didn’t alter his history in the slightest?  I find it hard to accept that he’d be so concerned about never finding somebody, but would still kill Elle after making a legitimate connection with her.</p>
<p>I feel like a broken record, but that’s the biggest problem with Sylar’s character – and the reason why I can’t become invested in him.  He’s just so inconsistently written.  For example, the way it’s been portrayed, the “voice” in Parkman’s head WAS Sylar.  It wasn’t a delusion, it was Sylar’s actual subconscious.  And that man had absolutely no problem whatsoever killing people.  And even when he gets reunited with his body he’s able to kill, despite his struggle with Nathan.  But once he vanquishes all of his obstacles, he’s suddenly all bothered?  Sorry, I don’t buy it.</p>
<p>I am curious if they’ll strip him of his powers, though.  A lot of people have made the argument that Peter became too powerful, so essentially having him start from scratch was a good thing.  I’m wondering if they’ll have the guts to do the same with Sylar.</p>
<p>I wasn’t bothered by the stuff with Claire.  People seem to hate her character, but for whatever reason I think she manages to bring out the best in whoever she shares scenes with.  I noted that last week with HRG and Peter, but I think it’s true with Sylar as well.  These two just have such a twisted relationship – and while it was laid on a bit thick by Sylar, the two of them really do share a special bond.  Her self discovery also felt a little more genuine than Sylar’s.  She is, after all, at that age that people attempt to “find” themselves, and she’s going through some mighty confusing stuff right now.  It’s difficult for her to accept that she may have feelings for this girl, and she’s of course worried about being judged and labeled.  The writers are constantly attempting to coincide Claire’s abilities with her attempt at being a normal teenage girl next door, and this is the first time (in a long time) that it feels like they succeeded.</p>
<p>I also have to complement the writers by NOT having the extras stare at Gretchen and Claire as they walked away holding hands.  The easy, obvious path would have been for everybody to look at them and for Claire not to care.  The better route – the one they decided to take – was to have nobody care, and to show the viewers (and possibly Claire) that she was making a bigger thing out of it than was necessary.   This shows that this is something Claire has to overcome, not something everybody else has to accept.</p>
<p><strong>Matt Basilo has been writing for Inside Pulse since April 2005, providing his insight into popular television shows such as Lost, 24, Heroes, and Smallville. Be sure to visit his blog at <a href="http://acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">[a case of the blog]</a> and follow him on <a href="http://twitter.com/acaseofthetwit">Twitter</a>.</strong><br />
<topstory500x250> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory120x120> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2010/01/19/heroes-episode-4-15-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes - Episode 4-14 Review</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2010/01/12/heroes-episode-4-14-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2010/01/12/heroes-episode-4-14-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=177798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So if any good has come out of the failed Jay Leno experiment and the next installment of the late night wars, it’s that it may have bought Heroes another season (for my thoughts on the Leno/Conan “war,” visit my blog).  Of course, I guess that depends on your perspective and whether or not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if any good has come out of the failed Jay Leno experiment and the next installment of the late night wars, it’s that it may have bought <em>Heroes </em>another season (for my thoughts on the Leno/Conan “war,” visit <strong><a href="http://acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/team-conan.html">my blog</a></strong>).  Of course, I guess that depends on your perspective and whether or not fans WANT another season.</p>
<p>I’ve said it before, and a fair argument could be made that the writers have already hammered this point home, but I really do love how HRG’s actions – no matter how despicable they may be – can always be attributed to his love for Claire.  Look at all he had gone through this episode, from tracking this woman down to attaining Parkman’s assistance to infiltrating the Carnival – it was all done for Claire.  And all the while, he tried to be a respectful, “normal” father by keeping his distance when she needed some space.  I know a lot of people tire easily of Claire – and I’m sure HRG’s fan club has diminished somewhat – but these two will ALWAYS be the highlight of the series for me.</p>
<p>That being said, while their final scene together was well written, nicely directed, and wonderfully acted, it felt a little flat to me, only because it didn’t truly feel like anything was on the line.  They had only had their disagreement last week, and we’ve seen them fight so many times that it just didn’t feel like this could mark the end for them.  And I feel like we were supposed to think that was a possibility.</p>
<p>But yeah, it’s kinda sweet that everything this man does comes back to him wanting to protect his daughter.</p>
<p>I will have to say, though, that while I found Parkman a bit more enjoyable this season than I have in the past, this whole ordeal of people with abilities struggling to find a balance between normal life and something greater is getting a bit tiresome.  I feel like we’ve watched every single character essentially go through this inner turmoil – and it’s been happening every single season.  <em>Heroes</em> has been on for four years now, and it’s a bit troubling that we’re yet to see any character emerge as a bona fide superhero.  For the most part, everybody is still insecure and uncomfortable with their abilities.</p>
<p>I suppose if anybody’s there, Peter’s the closest.  Of course, all of his heroics tend to happen off-screen, which doesn’t really help matters.  I do now understand Emma’s purpose in this season’s arc – she’ll will people with abilities to Samuel, who will in turn become more and more powerful – but I still have trouble swallowing the fact this woman whose ability reminds me of a Skittles commercial can bring Ice Queen Angela Petrelli to a screeching halt and somehow cause the deaths of thousands of people.  That being said, I do think that (presumed) chain of events is pretty clever, and I do like how it came together.  I do have to wonder something, though:  Emma clearly cares enough about Peter to use her ability to bring him to her apartment.  Given that level of trust and emotion, there wasn’t a conceivable way for Peter to calmly explain the importance of destroying her cello?  I don’t even really like her character, and even I felt bad for her.  He just barges in, late at night, brutally smashes her cello, and leaves.  And the girl was so excited about receiving it as a gift.  That’s pretty messed up.</p>
<p>If there was a weak point in the episode, it was the Hiro/Ando/Mohinder trifecta, although that should come as no surprise.  Truthfully, their scenes were a bit less harmless than they otherwise have been this season, but some of it was a bit hard to swallow.  I mean, Ando can creepily hover around the medication and the orderly – evidently the only one in the room – brushes the behavior off after a single inquiry?</p>
<p>I do have to admit, I did laugh at Mohinder’s hurried and urgent, “was it in Florida?” line.  His delivery was so matter-of-fact.  Hiro, Ando, and Mohinder awkwardly waving like four year old children, on the other hand, was a tad over the top.</p>
<p><strong>Matt Basilo has been writing for Inside Pulse since April 2005, providing his insight into popular television shows such as Lost, 24, Heroes, and Smallville. Be sure to visit his blog at <a href="http://acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">[a case of the blog]</a> and follow him on <a href="http://twitter.com/acaseofthetwit">Twitter</a>.</strong><br />
<topstory500x250> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory120x120> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2010/01/12/heroes-episode-4-14-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes - Episode 4-12 Review</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/12/01/heroes-episode-4-12-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/12/01/heroes-episode-4-12-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=177458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So was this the end of the volume?  If so, talk about going out with a whimper.  I don’t recall any hype leading to this finale – and if it was the last episode of this volume, with one exception, it really didn’t deliver a climatic conclusion.
That one exception, ironically enough, is the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So was this the end of the volume?  If so, talk about going out with a whimper.  I don’t recall any hype leading to this finale – and if it was the last episode of this volume, with one exception, it really didn’t deliver a climatic conclusion.</p>
<p>That one exception, ironically enough, is the whole Sylar/Nathan story.  I’ve been awfully critical of this arc, particularly with the lack of restraint exhibited by the writers, but I have to admit that they did a wonderful job of wrapping things up.  It really was a genuinely heartfelt, touching, emotional, and nicely scripted character departure.  They hit all the right notes, and the acting was spot on.</p>
<p>I believe I made reference to this last week, but I really did enjoy Nathan’s confused reaction to his utterly unique situation.  He possesses all of Nathan’s memories (and by proxy his emotions) and he physically looks like Nathan, yet he knows he’s not Nathan.  Despite everything he thinks and feels, he knows it’s all a lie.  How does one react to that?  How do you come to grips with that reality?  Adrian Pasdar really nailed that rooftop scene, in my opinion.</p>
<p>Along with Claire and HRG, I’ve always felt that Peter and Nathan was one of the strongest relationships on the series.  Most would argue that one or both of those above relationships are completely overexposed and often repetitive – which is a fair point – but I always find that even when the show as a whole is at its weakest, a great scene between these characters can really save an entire episode.  And in some cases, an entire storyline.</p>
<p>And quite honestly, I do think this episode did a whole lot to redeem the disappointing Sylar/Nathan saga.  Over the past two seasons, Peter has really grown up and become independent and strong.  And he exhibited that here.  While his brutal treatment of Sylar was wonderful and completely justified, I have trouble seeing Peter “going there” the first two years we knew him.  Similarly, the two brothers reminiscing about their first exhibition of their abilities acted as a great contrast to their final moments together.  In the past, it was Nathan who flew up to grab hold of Peter.  In this episode it was Peter who let go of Nathan, releasing him so that he could face his proper fate.</p>
<p>Likewise, their parting words were also right on the money.  For better or for worse, Nathan is the crutch that Peter has always leaned on.  In fact, I do believe that every volume has ended the same way:  With the brothers confronting each other and ultimately joining forces to save the world (or each other).  Despite his growth, Peter has always had difficulty sealing the deal without Nathan by his side.  In fairness, in season one he was talking about how scared he was and how he needed his brother.  By the end of season three Nathan was merely reinforcement.  Nonetheless, Peter pleading with Nathan that he needs him felt true, as did Nathan’s response that Peter can take care f himself.  I’m also thrilled that Nathan mentioned watching over Claire.  Does it strike it as odd to anybody else that these two were kept at a complete distance (physically and verbally) for the entire season?</p>
<p>And by the way, I’m glad they silently showed the embrace between Peter and his mother.  It was definitely one of those scenes that was more powerful by allowing us to imagine how the conversation went down.</p>
<p>But honestly, they need to cool it with the Rene stuff.  We found out the Haitian’s name, like, four episodes ago….and I feel like he’s being name dropped multiple times per episode ever since.  I almost expected Peter to say, “Our Haitian friend….Rene!” when he explained to Sylar how he was blocking his powers.</p>
<p>I take real issue with this whole Claire/Carnival thing.  At its core, I just don’t buy it.  Out of all the characters on the show, Claire is the most outspoken about attempting to live a normal life.  And even if I accept that she’s simply given up on trying to hide and wants to be around people just like her, I find it incredibly hard to swallow that her solution to this would be to join a bunch of strangers who hide in plain sight.  As I noted last week, her birth father, uncle, and grandmother all possess abilities.  As does somebody in her sorority.  She’s also become chummy with Parkman, Tracy, and Hiro.  This girl is perpetually drawn to people with abilities, many of whom she knows and loves.  I’m sorry, but I find it hard to believe that she’d rather take a compass on a whim, rather than, I don’t know, saying she wants to spend her Christmas break in New York City so that she can be around her biological father’s ability-ridden family.</p>
<p>Along with that, the whole bit with the Minor League pitcher was just lazy, unmotivated writing.  I honestly find it hard to believe that, no matter how big a jerk he is and no matter how much his ego has been bruised, that some guy would go out and get completely drunk because he lost in a carnival game.  I find it even harder to believe that he would break a bottle and take a swing at a teenage girl – one that’s barely over five foot, no less.  It’s completely obvious that the scene was written backwards.  The writers said, “We need Samuel to look sympathetic and for Claire to come to his aid.  How can we make that happen?  Hey, didn’t we feature a jerky baseball pitcher a few scenes back?”</p>
<p>And going back to my original question – is this the end of “Redemption”?  If so, talk about leaving loose ends.  What about Hiro and Charlie?  And for that matter, why was Hiro randomly with Mohinder (ugh) and Ando?  I can understand him time traveling to rescue Mohinder, but to swing around and pick up Ando as well?  Why?  And what about Tracy?  She was the one character that seemingly had a logistical motivation to join the circus, yet she’s nowhere to be seen (except for a brief second) in the episode that seemingly is supposed to bring them together?  And despite building it up rather nicely all season long, they suddenly do a complete 180 regarding HRG’s desire to redeem himself by now protecting those with abilities?  Then there’s Parkman.  He escaped the hospital and went off to….ya’ know, I’m not even sure.</p>
<p>Anyway, there’s no indication on the Internet whether this was the finale, so I’m assuming it’s not.  I hope some of the above issues are dealt with in 2010.</p>
<p><strong>Matt Basilo has been writing for Inside Pulse since April 2005, providing his insight into popular television shows such as Lost, 24, Heroes, and Smallville. Be sure to visit his blog at <a href="http://acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">[a case of the blog]</a> and follow him on <a href="http://twitter.com/acaseofthetwit">Twitter</a>.</strong><br />
<topstory500x250> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory120x120> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/12/01/heroes-episode-4-12-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes - Episode 4-11 Review</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/11/25/heroes-episode-4-11-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/11/25/heroes-episode-4-11-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=177405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This might surprise some, but I honestly really don’t have anything critical to say about this week’s episode of Heroes.  Indeed, despite the lack of action, it was one of the most focused episodes I’ve seen in quite some time.  The three stories related to each other through a central theme, and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might surprise some, but I honestly really don’t have anything critical to say about this week’s episode of <em>Heroes</em>.  Indeed, despite the lack of action, it was one of the most focused episodes I’ve seen in quite some time.  The three stories related to each other through a central theme, and the characters that appeared in the episode were restricted to the bare essentials (consider the fact that there were just as many central characters as there were regulars).</p>
<p>While “concept” episodes such as “A very special Thanksgiving” tend to be a risk, I think Heroes pulled it off.  As I alluded to earlier, the episode revolved around three families – the Bennets, the Petrellis, and the Carnival – celebrating the holiday.  And while all three families experienced turmoil, they ultimately arrived at three different destinations.  The Bennets overcame their conflicts and began the mending process of becoming a modern nuclear family.  The Carnival began to implode.  And the Petrellis attempted to defy all logic and rationalization to somehow continue to be a family.</p>
<p>In my opinion the Carnival was the weak link of the episode, but at the very least their story progressed.</p>
<p>The high point for me may have been the Bennet family get together.  I recall the DVD commentary for a season one episode of <em>Heroes</em> (may have been the infamous “Company Man”) in which one of the producers observed that since season one didn’t focus on any relationships, the tumultuous bond between HRG and Claire acted as the metaphorical “romance” of the season.  And that’s a fair assessment:  They began happy, they experienced trust issues, they had a falling out, and then they reconciled.  And while their general turmoil did become a bit repetitive throughout the second season, they really have developed into the deepest relationship on the series.  And with that in mind, I really enjoyed the fact that despite all the lies, deceit, and broken promises, Claire’s father is the parent that truly knows and understands her.  Without knowing about their experimentation, HRG recognized how important Gretchen was to Claire.  In fact, he went the distance of inviting her to their family dinner, when Claire’s mother wasn’t even really aware of her existence.</p>
<p>Claire’s differing interactions between her parents’ new beaus was pretty telling as well.  While she shared knowing stares with HRG regarding her mom’s cartoonish new boyfriend, she remained relatively respectful and friendly with Lauren.  Having said that (anybody know that reference?), I do think I would have preferred the HRG/Tracy relationship.  If they’re keeping her on the show, they might as well continue with the one thing that was working.</p>
<p>I suppose if I had one negative thing to say about the episode, it’s that I don’t really buy Claire’s temptation to join the Carnival.  I mean, it’s not as if this girl is hard pressed to find people like her.  Her birth father has abilities, as does her uncle and her grandmother.  Through her misadventures, she’s met several others – many of whom keep popping up in her life.  Hell, there’s at least one person in her sorority that has abilities.  It just seems to me that if Claire wanted to be around people like her, a group of creepy strangers who perform for others wouldn’t be her top option.</p>
<p>But don’t read too much into that rant, it really was a strong episode.</p>
<p>When Peter and Nathan found out the truth about Nathan’s death, I became particularly interested with Peter’s emotional dilemma.  Could he continue loving his brother, knowing that he’s actually within the body of a murderous killer (and, indeed, the person who killed his brother)?  But by that token, if it’s essentially Nathan’s mind and memory within Sylar’s body, is the exterior “shell” really that significant?  Having said that, it’s still Sylar’s mind, heart, and soul.  The memories are just manufactured.  So is it truly Nathan in there either?  To me, these were interesting questions.  And I was worried and disappointed that there wouldn’t be enough time to explore these ideas.  However, this episode left me pleasantly surprised.</p>
<p>In my opinion, Nathan, Peter, and Angela all hit a homerun with their emotional confusion.  Angela surely felt remorse and perhaps regret, but she was still an emotional wreck as she recounted the scenario.  It was great how, with tears in her eyes, it was obvious she was a heartbroken mother.  Yet her words unsuccessfully attempted to make it seem like this was some sort of public relations decision.  Likewise, the eternally optimistic Peter tried his hardest to make sense of this situation in a way that would allow him to keep his brother.  And ultimately he realized that his love for Nathan was greater than his hatred for Sylar.</p>
<p>And despite being a tired character (or some would argue an amalgamation of two tired characters), Nathan/Sylar did the best job of wrestling with this impossible situation.  As Nathan, he was resentful.  As Sylar, he was vengeful.  And throughout it all, it felt believable.  The thematic symbolism was in full force here as well.  While the Bennets were in a cozy apartment, sun shining, the Petrellis were in a cold, lifeless apartment, dark and unfeeling.</p>
<p>Finally, there’s the Carnival scene.  Following Hiro’s revelation to Lydia and Edgar that Samuel had killed his brother, this family is slowly but surely beginning to crumble.  And like any threatened villain, when he realizes the heat is on, Samuel diverts the attention to one of the people revolting against him.  Anyway, just so I understand this correctly, what’s the deal with Samuel’s ability?  The more special people he surrounds himself with, the more powerful he becomes?</p>
<p>I will say this, though:  While Hiro’s boyish charm is part of the reason why the character became so popular, the writers need to remember that he’s not 11 years old.  Referring to every single person by a child-like nickname and squealing when a girl undresses in front of him is taking it a bit far.</p>
<p><strong>Matt Basilo has been writing for Inside Pulse since April 2005, providing his insight into popular television shows such as Lost, 24, Heroes, and Smallville. Be sure to visit his blog at <a href="http://acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">[a case of the blog]</a> and follow him on <a href="http://twitter.com/acaseofthetwit">Twitter</a>.</strong><br />
<topstory120x120> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory500x250> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/11/25/heroes-episode-4-11-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes - Episode 4-10 Review</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/11/17/heroes-episode-4-10-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/11/17/heroes-episode-4-10-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=177276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before getting to this week’s episode, let’s revisit what should be known as “The Great Sylar Debate.”  The big question we can’t seem to find a satisfying answer for:  Did Sylar lose his powers at the conclusion of season one/beginning of season two, when he contracted the Shanti virus?
Most of the people who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before getting to this week’s episode, let’s revisit what should be known as “The Great Sylar Debate.”  The big question we can’t seem to find a satisfying answer for:  Did Sylar lose his powers at the conclusion of season one/beginning of season two, when he contracted the Shanti virus?</p>
<p>Most of the people who have said “yes,” seem to believe so out of assumption (after all, he seemingly rarely uses any of those abilities other than telekinesis and his original power).  In my opinion, that’s a weak argument.  That’s like saying, “he doesn’t use any of those powers, except for the ones he uses.”  I mean, when he clearly uses more than one of his season one abilities, I have trouble accepting such a blanket, unsubstantiated statement.  Also consider that the Haitian (or, ugh, Rene) suffered from the Shanti virus, but his abilities were right back to normal after he received the vaccine.  I know their powers aren’t exactly the same, but there’s really no basis for the belief that the virus would set him back to square one.</p>
<p>Anyway, here’s what some of the readers had to offer:</p>
<p><em>The future Gabriel also had the ability to “paint the future” which he hadn’t been using since the first season. In that season, Sylar learns how to take powers without killing, basically Peter’s ability. It is quite possible that meeting with Peter allowed the powers he lost to be used once again (and it’s possible that those powers had been aquired from Future Peter)</p>
<p>I don’t recall the mini-explosion hands … I know he’s used lightning quite frequently. </p>
<p>There are a number of abilities that Sylar has collected and rarely ever uses, which is part of the problem. Season 2 he spent most of the season without any powers. The start of this season he’s basically Peter at the start of Season 2 … he is only manifesting some of his powers because of memory loss. Still, there were a number of first season powers, like freezing, he never used since getting his abilities back.</p>
<p>In my quick skimming of the recaps for both parts of Season 3 (chapters 3 and 4) I don’t recall him using any old power. He doesn’t even use some of the powers he aquires (Bob’s alchemy, Jesse’s scream) very often, but lightning is up there with telekenesis on “most used”. And healing of course.</em></p>
<p>Upon second thought, I may have been mistaken about Sylar-as-Nathan using Ted’s radioactive ability.  Now that I think about it, it may very well have been Elle’s lightning.  But, again, the fact remains that Future Sylar did use at least two of the abilities he acquired when talking to Peter – Isaac’s paint the future, and Ted’s radiation.  But, as noted, he may have acquired those abilities from Peter.  I find that to be a bit of a stretch, though.  I mean, it’s almost a chicken-or-the-egg situation.  Sylar’s absorbing Peter’s abilities while Peter is taking Sylar’s.  Forget the butterfly crap – THAT’S gotta mess up the timespace continuum.</p>
<p>However, Kristina seems to shed some light on this issue:</p>
<p><em>In week 1 of Behind the Eclipse, in which writers/producers Joe Pokaski and Aron Coliete answer fan questions, this very issue was discussed:</p>
<p>Q: “In ‘The Second Coming,’ Sylar says to Claire, ‘You see, I lost everything that made me special.’ Does Sylar mean that he permanently lost all of his acquired powers except for telekinesis? Has his slate of powers been ‘wiped clean’ and does he have to start all over again?</p>
<p>A: Nope that’s right. Sylar’s starting over. Getting a whole new slate of powers as he goes.</p>
<p>Then in week 7 when the devastating impact of Gabriel’s first kill is revealed, the writers explain why his telekenisis, acquired by Brian Davis, is the only acquired power he retained: “Brian was Sylar’s first kill and his power is connected to emotional empathy.”</p>
<p>Sylar’s telekenetic power has become a part of him almost as much as his original power, much more so than any other power he’s attained. That is why when he recovered from the Shanti virus he retained only this acquired power. All the others were lost because they weren’t as much a part of him.</em></p>
<p>Even though this comes from an undeniably reliable source, I still have issue accepting something that’s not officially canon (as in, explicitly stated on the show).  That’s not me being stubborn – that’s just been my experience.  I’ve seen instances in which a scene has been filmed but cut for some reason, and ultimately that story gets completely rewritten later on (and is totally contradictory to that original, unseen scene).  Unfortunately, I can’t think of a specific example.</p>
<p>To me, the “Brian was Sylar’s first kill and his power is connected to emotional empathy” is extremely weak.  It almost sounds like they realized this would make a good reason after the fact.  And for that matter, I have a hard time believing that Brian was his most empathetic kill.  How about Isaac, who he spent weeks stalking and preying upon before murdering in cold blood?  And that kill was motivated by exceptionally devious and ambitious thoughts.</p>
<p>Anyway, I’m not completely closed minded.  I am willing to accept that he lost all of his abilities (except for the ones he didn’t lose), but to me it really boils down to just lazy and inconsistent writing.  When it’s convenient that he has a certain ability (like super hearing to eavesdrop on HRG’s plot with Slider-man), he suddenly has it.  I suppose it’s a bit of a moot point, as he basically only uses telekinesis anyway.</p>
<p>Moving onto this week’s episode, then.  I can’t quite put my finger on it.  There were quite a few things I liked, actually, but I couldn’t help but feel like it would have been better suited for the season finale.  Now that I think about it, there was actually quite a bit that was good about this episode.  We learned more about the Carnival.  We discovered that Samuel can be solidly classified as a villain.  Peter and Nathan found out the truth about what had happened to Nathan last season.  And Sylar-as-Nathan was reunited with Sylar-as-Parkman.  Yet throughout this entire episode, even during the parts that I thought were entertaining and – to be generous – climatic, I couldn’t help but feel like it would have benefited astronomically from being properly built up.  I mean, how much more powerful would that aforementioned reunion have been if we didn’t already see Sylar back in his regular physical state for several episodes?  I’ve been saying this all season, but I feel like they handled the Nathan/Sylar thing incredibly prematurely.  I can’t stress this enough, but they really missed the boat with the psychotic Sylar being imprisoned by a body with a single relatively weak ability, while generally good Nathan discovers that he’s got a plethora of abilities at his disposal.</p>
<p>It’s a bit ironic, I suppose.  Season two was almost universally panned because of its terribly slow pace (honestly, the whole Hiro in Feudal Japan thing felt like an eternity).  Yet I can’t help but feel like this season will come up short for the opposite reason:  The writers failed to show any restraint whatsoever (for what it’s worth, I believe that season three – and not season one – was the best middle ground).</p>
<p>And speaking of irony, I can’t wrap my head around the fact that Nathan is being written off while Parkman – who is officially useless now that he’s no longer being possessed by Sylar – continues to exist.  And holy Hell, they’re bringing Mohinder back?  Honestly, the next time I hear, “I’ve made a remarkable discovery!” or that damn instrumental theme music again, it’ll be too soon.  If<em> Heroes </em>is granted another season, I think they really need to sit back and re-evaluate their casting decisions.  I would have kept Nathan but dumped Mohinder, Tracy, and Parkman, and a very, very strong case could be made for Hiro, Ando, and Sylar.  Am I forgetting anybody?  Honestly, at this point, I wouldn’t mind seeing a renewed focus on the younger characters, like Micah and Molly (what are the chances that she’s taller than Claire now?)</p>
<p>Speaking of the cheerleader, the girl bonding between Claire and Tracy was harmless enough.  Truth is, I kinda like the budding relationship between HRG and Tracy, so I didn’t really mind the whole thing that much (and HRG nonchalantly greeting the girls when he came in was a bit sweet).  I do have to wonder, though:  Why didn’t Claire put her foot back on immediately?  I mean, how incredibly creepy is it that she was just sitting around with a stump as her broken foot sits on the coffee table?  That is beyond weird.  And I do have to ask:  Did we ever actually get an explanation as to why Tracy was losing control of her abilities?  Did she just need to surround herself with estrogen?</p>
<p>And oh yeah – I’m on Twitter now!  <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/acaseofthetwit">Follow me</a></strong>!</p>
<p><strong>Matt Basilo has been writing for Inside Pulse since April 2005, providing his insight into popular television shows such as Lost, 24, Heroes, and Smallville. Be sure to visit his blog at <a href="http://acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">[a case of the blog]</a> and follow him on <a href="http://twitter.com/acaseofthetwit">Twitter</a>.</strong><br />
<topstory500x250>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory120x120>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/11/17/heroes-episode-4-10-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes &#8211; Episode 4-8 Review</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/11/03/heroes-episode-4-8-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/11/03/heroes-episode-4-8-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=176839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long-time reader and contributor Creed left this comment in regards to last week’s episode:
Well said, though I think they are completely missing the boat with Ali Larter. Her original character had an interesting duality, though it became less interesting once the personality split was resolved, but Tracy is as interesting as a block of ice. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long-time reader and contributor Creed left this comment in regards to last week’s episode:</p>
<p><em>Well said, though I think they are completely missing the boat with Ali Larter. Her original character had an interesting duality, though it became less interesting once the personality split was resolved, but Tracy is as interesting as a block of ice. However, when Tracy found the Doctor responsible for her creation, he said there were THREE of them. They could have left Tracy dead at the end of last season and moved onto the third, doing whatever they want with her.</em></p>
<p>I could be mistaken, but I had always assumed that the triplets were Niki, Jessica, and Tracy.  That was my interpretation, anyway.</p>
<p>By the way, a couple of weeks ago I wrote an exclusive piece on my blog about how <em>Heroes</em> should model <em>True Blood’s </em>second season story arc.  The popular HBO series reminded me a great deal of the first season of <em>Heroes</em>, as virtually all of the characters had their own stories, which culminated in a single climax.  <strong><a href="http://acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/true-hero.html">Click here</a></strong> to give it a read.</p>
<p>Moving onto this week’s episode.  I spent a lot of last season talking about how this show really needs to distance themselves from the whole time travel thing.  However, that was mostly aimed at characters going into the future, realizing something dire is going to happen, and then attempting to prevent it in the present.  My issue with this formula – which they relied on for pretty much every single season – was that at a point I began saying to myself, “Why should I care if they stop THIS catastrophe?  There’s only going to be a different one taking its place.”</p>
<p>So I was a bit surprised to discover that I actually really did enjoy this episode – especially since it focused heavily on two characters I’ve been extremely critical of this season (Hiro and Sylar).  Sure,<br />
Charlie’s “Wikipedia” reference was a little forced, but I actually liked watching the typically selfless and childish Hiro making a series of selfish and in turn adult decisions.  Hiro could have killed Sylar and prevented a whole lot of misery, but he felt he had to preserve the timeline.  Yet as Charlie rightly pointed out, he already mucked that up by allowing her to live (oh, and apparently Sylar now has the ability to cure brain aneurisms?  That was just a tad on the weak side).</p>
<p>Actually, now that I think about it, shouldn’t Sylar’s super memory (which he originally acquired through Charlie) have made it exceptionally difficult for Parkman to wipe his memory clean?  But on a lighter note, I do have to admit that the “where’s your sword?” response to “I’m Future-Hiro” did make me laugh after the second time it was said.</p>
<p>This may surprise people, given my typical lauding of the character, but HRG’s portion of the story was my least favorite.  By a rather large margin as well.  In my opinion, HRG was the breakout star of season one, and a big reason for that was the complexity of his character.  Here was a guy who was willing to do bad things – but he did it all out of this perverse desire to protect his family.  And that’s what made Noah Bennet so wonderfully complicated:  Despite being the consummate “Company Man,” in reality he was nothing more than a family guy.  Above all else, it was about his wife, son, and daughter.</p>
<p>These flashbacks, however, seemed to completely dilute this aspect of his character in order to make sense of where he is now and where they want him to go.  Honestly, his desired redemption doesn’t make as much sense if we learn that his motives were always altruistic and that his fight was always a noble one.  Along with that, the intriguing duality of his character – that despite his “badness,” he was devoted to his family – is severely hindered if we discover that he was emotionally cheating on his wife, and had come THIS CLOSE to physically cheating as well.</p>
<p>So no, I didn’t care for this part of the show.  It felt cheap and it didn’t really mesh with what we already know about the character and the Company’s infrastructure, for that matter.  And essentially rewriting the character, and “softening” his past self, really damages the personal growth he’s made over the past few seasons.</p>
<p>We finally learned a bit more about the Carnival, but not much.  And while I’m not eager to see Mohinder again, I did find the final reveal pretty neat.  Turns out, the guy was presumably murdered eight weeks ago.  Is anybody else hoping that Hiro doesn’t so much succeed in saving him?</p>
<p>But, at the very least, Hiro and Samuel appear to be following the “Redemption” theme.  And that’s a good thing, I suppose.</p>
<p><strong>Matt Basilo has been writing for Inside Pulse since April 2005, providing his insight into popular television shows such as Lost, 24, Heroes, and Smallville. You can visit his blog at <a href="http://acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">[a case of the blog]</a>.</strong><br />
<topstory500x250>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory120x120>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/11/03/heroes-episode-4-8-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes &#8211; Episode 4-7 Review</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/10/27/heroes-episode-4-7-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/10/27/heroes-episode-4-7-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=176674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there was ever a “filler” episode of Heroes, this was it.  However, “filler” is decidedly different from “stalling,” so I’ll chalk this up as the lesser of two evils.  Normally episodes such as these are a necessary evil when it comes to properly pacing the season, however with such a large cast [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there was ever a “filler” episode of <em>Heroes</em>, this was it.  However, “filler” is decidedly different from “stalling,” so I’ll chalk this up as the lesser of two evils.  Normally episodes such as these are a necessary evil when it comes to properly pacing the season, however with such a large cast with so many stories going on, it’s admittedly a bit tough to defend.</p>
<p>I suppose if there was any “A” story, it was Sylar’s continued haunting of Parkman.  I will admit that I found it somewhat funny that this entire time Parkman has been pretending to be a recovering addict, and then in the end alcohol ended up overcoming his proverbial demon.  And, actually, I enjoyed the climatic reveal that Sylar had officially taken over Parkman’s body.  However, I can’t help but be disappointed that they’ve really missed out on the fun dichotomy of Sylar’s consciousness living in Parkman’s body, and Nathan’s consciousness living in Sylar’s body.  Instead, we’ve just got this massive overexposure of Sylar.  He is just all over the place.</p>
<p>But man, did I ever cringe when Parkman called Mohinder.</p>
<p>I’ve repeatedly stated that Ali Larter is the weakest link of the <em>Heroes</em> cast.  For whatever reason, they just can’t make any of her characters work in the series.  But, as I’ve noted, I’ve really, really enjoyed this progressive bond between her and HRG (yeah, you heard me).  After all, these are pretty much the only two characters who are expressing the “redemption” portion of this volume.  They’ve been a pretty fun pair.  And, for the most part, I still feel that way.  However, this whole thing with Tracy getting drawn to the carnival is a tad too reminiscent of what we saw last season, with Tracy joining up with that volume’s lead antagonist, Papa Petrelli.  As I’ve indicated with Sylar, we don’t need to see the same characters having the same struggle over and over again.</p>
<p>And that’s why I continue to dig HRG – he’s one of the few characters that legitimately seems to grow as a person.  I buy that he wants to make up for his past mistakes, and I thought his performance this week was really strong.  He genuinely wanted to help Jeremy, and you could really feel HRG’s pain when he discovered Jeremy’s body.</p>
<p>Not much to say about the Claire/Gretchen thing, except that four girls seems like an awfully small pledge class, doesn’t it?  Seriously, though, I was a bit relieved we didn’t have to sit through Claire and Gretchen going through some super duper awkward phase where they avoid each other and pretend like nothing happened for a gabillion episodes.  No, I don’t think Claire will end up being a lesbian, but I was glad she handled the situation with such straight forward maturity.</p>
<p>I’d hate to sound overly negative, but I’m having a lot of trouble getting into this whole carnival thing.  Personally, I’m more interested in the redemption aspect of this season, instead of force feeding a plot point that will eventually bring the characters together.  This is one of the cases where the build has been a bit too slow.  We’re a few episodes in, and I feel like I have no real understanding of who these people are.  Or their motivations, for that matter.  They may be manipulative, but are they decidedly evil?  And without that distinction, I don’t find myself particularly invested in who does and doesn’t decide to join them.</p>
<p>What I think we need is a “Company Man” type episode that focuses solely on the carnival crew.  And we need that soon.</p>
<p><strong>Matt Basilo has been writing for Inside Pulse since April 2005, providing his insight into popular television shows such as Lost, 24, Heroes, and Smallville. You can visit his blog at <a href="http://acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">[a case of the blog]</a>.</strong><br />
<topstory500x250>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory120x120>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/10/27/heroes-episode-4-7-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes - Episode 4-6 Review</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/10/20/heroes-episode-4-6-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/10/20/heroes-episode-4-6-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=176497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though there’s a decidedly snide tone to my reviews – and I do criticize the show a fair amount – I truly do enjoy Heroes.  It’s not a flawless show, and the flaws tend to really get under my skin (mostly because many of them could be fixed so easily), but at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though there’s a decidedly snide tone to my reviews – and I do criticize the show a fair amount – I truly do enjoy <em>Heroes</em>.  It’s not a flawless show, and the flaws tend to really get under my skin (mostly because many of them could be fixed so easily), but at the end of the day there are several characters I really like, and it’s an hour that doesn’t drag.  Admittedly, I don’t have that “I can’t wait until next Monday!” feeling, but I would be legitimately disappointed if this was one of the shows impacted by the Leno Effect.</p>
<p>I also felt that this was one of the stronger episodes of the season, mostly because it primarily featured three characters I have a soft spot for (HRG, Claire, and Peter) – who, incidentally, also bring out the best in each other, scene-wise – and while I tend to tire of the utterly redundant Sylar and Hiro, I felt they were, for the most part, harmless this episode.</p>
<p>Last week I joked about Peter accidentally acquiring somebody’s ability, only to discover that it was nowhere near as cool or helpful as the one he just had.  Near the end of this episode, there was a lingering thought in my head that kept yelling, “Peter, don’t touch anybody!”  I could just imagine him going through all of these obstacles to gain the capabilities to save Hiro, only to politely shake hands with the wrong person and realize that he can now shoot rainbows and silly string from his eyes.  I am curious to see how they manage to have Peter maintain this ability until he’s reunited with Hiro.  Very interesting.</p>
<p>I really do love what’s happening with HRG this season.  When the powers-that-be decided to make Sylar the epicenter of the show, HRG’s character really suffered.  And while they force-feed Sylar’s constant internal struggle, HRG is a legitimately complex character that I daresay the vast majority of the audience is emotionally invested in.  Along with that, he’s perhaps the only character that hasn’t been terrorized by the inconsistent writing.</p>
<p>This Volume is titled “Redemption,” and I’m glad that this theme is focusing on HRG.  His behavior throughout this episode in particular was wonderful, with him kindly and delicately talking down the healer, and then coming up with an explanation for what happened to his parents.  I was especially touched by his epiphany that he had let the boy down, and that while he may have been monitoring these people, he wasn’t looking out for them.</p>
<p>Hiro is on a similar journey, using his ability to right certain past wrongs.  With Hiro, it’s a fine line between endearing and annoying.  His childish desire to fulfill his destiny was lovable the first season, but that was three years ago.  You’d think his father’s murder and his impending death might alter his behavior a bit.  Look at Peter:  His character is essentially the same, and his charms are still present, but his perspective has certainly changed after everything that’s happened.  But this episode, he was on the right side of that fine line.  I actually did find him enjoyable, and his attempts to make Emma more comfortable with her abilities were sweet.  I am also curious to see what happens with him and Charlie.</p>
<p>Regarding Sylar, frankly I’m disappointed they so quickly abandoned the Nathan story arc in favor of doing something we’ve already seen in the past two Volumes.  How many times do we have to watch Sylar struggle with the concept of being a murderous killer?  We saw it when he thought he was a Petrelli, and we saw it AGAIN when he was being haunted by his dead mother (and when he was paling around with that annoying teenager).  Constantly resorting to this emotional mechanism is counterproductive.  It’s hard to sympathize with him because we have already seen him consciously choose to become a killer numerous times before.  At the same time, it’s hard to view him as a crazed murderer when he’s clearly so troubled by his actions.  Unfortunately, this doesn’t make him complex.  Instead, he’s just uneven and ineffective.</p>
<p>At this point, I sort of just wish they pulled the trigger and turned him into a hero when he thought he was a Petrelli.  Arguably, the most I ever cared about the character was when I saw him in the future, with a son named after HRG, and presumably married to Elle, fighting alongside Peter.  If the writers had some restraint, I think I would have enjoyed sitting back and learning what events transpire that makes that future a reality.  I’m guessing that future didn’t involve him renting a car, though.</p>
<p><strong>Matt Basilo has been writing for Inside Pulse since April 2005, providing his insight into popular television shows such as Lost, 24, Heroes, and Smallville. You can visit his blog at <a href="http://acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">[a case of the blog]</a>.</strong><br />
<topstory500x250>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory120x120>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/10/20/heroes-episode-4-6-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes - Episode 4-5 Review</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/10/13/heroes-episode-4-5-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/10/13/heroes-episode-4-5-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=176378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You gotta admire Peter….using the vulnerability of some girl who is confused about what’s happening to her in order to get a date.
That being said, I do love that the scenario that I’ve been waiting for has finally happened:  Peter has a kick ass power, and accidentally loses it in favor of a significantly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You gotta admire Peter….using the vulnerability of some girl who is confused about what’s happening to her in order to get a date.</p>
<p>That being said, I do love that the scenario that I’ve been waiting for has finally happened:  Peter has a kick ass power, and accidentally loses it in favor of a significantly less impressive power.  “Yeah, I had super speed and was able to save a lot of lives.  Now I, um….see wavy colors in response to sounds?”  That’ll sure come in handy!</p>
<p>Last week I discussed how disappointed I was that they rushed the return of Sylar.  While I do think he was handled adequately enough, do we really need to see Sylar going through yet another identity crisis where he’s trying to be good, but ultimately can’t fight what he is?  Honestly, Nathan’s memory and appearance forcibly taking over Sylar’s body, and Sylar’s subconscious taking over Matt’s mind is a far more interesting story, in my opinion.  At least that’s something we haven’t seen yet.  And, additionally, it’s a pretty fun commentary on the whole Nature vs. Nurture thing.  Sylar is an undeniably bad person, but if his physical body and literal mind is taking over by somebody who is, for all intents and purposes, good and loved, will “Sylar” turn good as well?  Likewise, can somebody like Matt – who has always tried to help others – turn bad after a little prodding from an evil man?</p>
<p>That’s far more interesting to me than watching Sylar’s internal struggle for the millionth time.  </p>
<p>And, for that matter, does this mean we’re not going to see Nathan again?</p>
<p>So we finally got that long-hyped kiss between Claire and Gretchen.  I’ll admit that they did a pretty effective job of setting up Gretchen as a wacko before turning it around and making her come across as pretty sympathetic.  I’m not quite sure where they’re going to take it from here, though.</p>
<p>At times I’m not a fan of the whole “flashback so that we can explain how everything happened” when it appears to be pretty obvious, but I actually through the revelation that the invisible sorority girl was actually responsible for just about everything that has happened to Claire since coming to college was pretty neat.</p>
<p>And while I’m typically a proponent of taking your time and building up to something, I am beginning to hope that they reveal what exactly one of these heroes will be replacing at the carnival.  When it comes to TV story arcs, I think I’m more patient than most people, but even I’m starting to get tired of the periodic (and increasingly repetitive) carnival scenes where we hear a lot of vague dialogue that doesn’t really provide a lot of substantial information.</p>
<p>This makes me a bit curious to find out how many people actually watch those carnival-centric webisodes, because these scenes really don’t make me want to see more of them.</p>
<p><strong>Matt Basilo has been writing for Inside Pulse since April 2005, providing his insight into popular television shows such as Lost, 24, Heroes, and Smallville. You can visit his blog at <a href="http://acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">[a case of the blog]</a>.</strong><br />
<topstory500x250>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory120x120>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/10/13/heroes-episode-4-5-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes - Episode 4-4 Review</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/10/06/heroes-episode-4-4-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/10/06/heroes-episode-4-4-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=176239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With this episode focusing mainly on the Hiro story arc, I can’t help but think about Charlie’s demise on Lost.  More specifically, I’m wondering if Heroes will have the cajones to do what the ABC hit series did.  For those of you unfamiliar with Lost, Charlie was a highly lovable, practically universally adored [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With this episode focusing mainly on the Hiro story arc, I can’t help but think about Charlie’s demise on <em>Lost</em>.  More specifically, I’m wondering if <em>Heroes </em>will have the cajones to do what the ABC hit series did.  For those of you unfamiliar with <em>Lost</em>, Charlie was a highly lovable, practically universally adored character who was killed off, arguably at the height of his popularity.  However, unlike most of the major deaths on the show, this departure was foreshadowed (quite literally) for the entire season.  Within the first few episodes of the season, Desmond told Charlie that he had visions of his death.  And throughout the year, fans were continually wondering, “Would they actually write this guy off?”  And they did, and I honestly believe that it will go down as one of the most beautifully written deaths in modern television history.</p>
<p>So I restate the question:  With Hiro’s current story arc revolving around his impending death, will the writers have the guts to pull the trigger and actually kill him?  Considering the last “major” character they’ve conclusively killed off is Isaac, near the end of season one, I’m not exactly optimistic.</p>
<p>This episode seemed to revert back to the “things are destined to happen, no matter what happens in the past” time travel mentality.  No matter what actions Hiro takes to prevent a certain event from happening, it’s bound to find a way to occur (kinda <em>Lost</em>-esque, actually).  This method ran the risk of getting old, but I couldn’t help but snicker when Hiro answered the phone, greeted his suicidal co-worker, and told him he’d be right up on the roof before the person on the other line even spoke.  And then, upon going up on the roof, they’re just casually sitting on the ledge talking.  Although I’m not quite sure what to make of his epiphany, because it seems counter-productive to what I figured they’d be doing with the character for much of the season.</p>
<p>Shifting gears slightly, I was THIS CLOSE to commending the show for actually showing some restraint by not featuring Sylar AT ALL this episode.  Then they went ahead and had Nathan transform back into Sylar (physically, anyway).  Only, what, five episodes into the season?  They had Hiro “find himself” in feudal Japan for what felt like 30 episodes, but they can’t stretch this potentially interesting arc out for at least an entire Volume?</p>
<p>Admittedly, my judgment may be a little premature.  We’ve only seen a snippet of where this is going.  But my disappointment lies in the fact that we jumped into the season at what feels like the mid-to-late point of this storyline.  I would have really preferred seeing Nathan more or less as himself, and then slowly coming to realize that something just isn’t right.  Instead, the season kicked off with Nathan KNOWING that something isn’t right (even awkwardly stating “it feels like my memories aren’t my own” – who talks like that?) and pretty much conclusively figuring it out within a couple of episodes.</p>
<p>Like I alluded to earlier, it’s amazing how easily this show can stall certain things, yet seemingly can’t show any restraint with intriguing stories that just need to be delicately developed.</p>
<p>That criticism aside, it is interesting (and I hope purposeful) that Nathan showed such a sympathetic and compassionate response to the prospect that he was in any way responsible for the girl’s death.  What I find compelling is that this is a decidedly Nathan trait, not at all reminiscent of Sylar’s behavior.  I mean, sure, Sylar may have shown some slight regret at certain dastardly actions, like killing his mother, but “Nathan” went to great lengths to unravel the mystery of what happened to this girl, and on more than one occasion attempted to take responsibility for it.  Doesn’t sound a whole lot like Sylar, does it?</p>
<p>I do wish they held off on the big transformation, though.</p>
<p><strong>Matt Basilo has been writing for Inside Pulse since April 2005, providing his insight into popular television shows such as Lost, 24, Heroes, and Smallville. You can visit his blog at <a href="http://www.acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">[a case of the blog]</a>.</strong><br />
<topstory500x250>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory120x120>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/10/06/heroes-episode-4-4-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes &#8211; Episode 4-3 Review</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/09/30/heroes-episode-4-2-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/09/30/heroes-episode-4-2-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=176129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I forgot to mention this last week, but somebody should really inform Peter that there are plenty of Legal Seafood chains in New Jersey.  So instead of needlessly running over two hundred miles, he really could have just taken a scenic twenty minute drive.  But hey, who am I to judge?
I seem to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to mention this last week, but somebody should really inform Peter that there are plenty of Legal Seafood chains in New Jersey.  So instead of needlessly running over two hundred miles, he really could have just taken a scenic twenty minute drive.  But hey, who am I to judge?</p>
<p>I seem to remember saying this last season, but by the end of the year the method was a distant memory, but I do appreciate the fact that the writers are not forcing every single character to be in every single episode.  For example, this week we didn’t see Hiro, Ando, Nathan, or Tracy, who all played a pretty significant role in the premiere.  Likewise, we’re yet to see Mohinder (and thank goodness for that!)  This episode was about three things:  Claire’s growth and HRG’s acceptance of that independence, Parkman’s descent, and the manipulation of Peter.  The characters that didn’t fit into that story simply didn’t appear.  And that’s how it should be.</p>
<p>I feel like last season did a lot of damage to Hiro’s character, and part of it was because the writers seemingly couldn’t think of a good story.  So as a result, the world nearly ended because Hiro made a stupid decision out of boredom.  I think Mohinder fell into a similar rut:  there was a desire to have him appear on the show, and as a result he either did more of the same, or was acting completely out of character.  Neither concept worked.</p>
<p>Frankly, at this point, I don’t think Mohinder even belongs on the show.  Honestly, I still believe he should have been killed off at the conclusion of the “Villains” volume.  It would have been an interesting twist on his character, as we’d ultimately learn that this seemingly noble scientist was actually more interested in one upping his father than helping people.  This ultimately turned him into one of the monsters he was apparently trying to save.  And, in the end, that was his downfall.  Instead the writers were unable to pull the trigger, and as a result he ended up right where he started, only a lot stronger.</p>
<p>Anyway, about this week’s three story points.  As I noted last week (and countless times before that), I’ve long considered Parkman to be one of the weakest characters on the show.  But this new development, with Sylar taking up residence in his head, has been a lot of fun.  As I said in my review of the premiere, it’s kinda interesting seeing Nathan existing in Sylar’s body, and Sylar living in Parkman’s head.  I was initially skeptical of having Sylar appear at all this season, but the way they’ve handled it – thus far – has been great.  I really loved how Sylar used Parkman’s ability against him (making him see and hear things that weren’t actually there), and I thought the subtle sounds of the ticking clock just after Parkman submitted and began reading people’s minds was excellent.  I also couldn’t help but laugh when an exasperated Sylar yelled, “Did he just….  People actually say that?” in response to the perpetrator’s</p>
<p>I would have done one thing differently, though:  I wouldn’t have had Angela have visions of Sylar, as I think it takes a bit of the urgency away from Parkman’s haunting.  It’s like, Angela sees Sylar, yet she’s able to live her life with semi-regularity.  But when Parkman begins seeing him, he goes absolutely bonkers.</p>
<p>Oh, and there’s one thing that I don’t quite understand.  I’m guessing that those in Parkman’s support group don’t actually know he can read minds.  As such, I assume that he’s leading people to believe that he’s a recovering alcoholic or drug addict.  If that’s the case, wouldn’t it be a pretty big deal if he slipped.  As in, if he just “used” – which, to me, sounds more like drugs than alcohol – wouldn’t certain precautions need to be taken before sending him in on a raid?  A drug raid, no less?</p>
<p>Moving onto the Bennet story arc.  I sort of cringed a bit when Claire threatened HRG that she’d banish him if he wiped Gretchen’s memory, because I couldn’t help but think, “again with this conflict?” but ultimately it proved to be an example of something I’m constantly begging for with this relationship:  Some growth and maturity.  Ultimately, Claire stood up for herself and, in a very adult manner, laid out how she wants to handle the situation.  In the end, HRG relented.  Part of me expected us to see the Haitian sneak through the window and wipe Gretchen’s memory while Claire was in the hallway talking to her dad on the phone, but instead we just learned that HRG had decided to respect her decision.  He even apologized!</p>
<p>By the way, the ultra tense, feigned happy lunch date was wonderful.  The glances between Claire and Gretchen, and HRG and Claire, were spot on.  I loved the fact that you just KNEW HRG was completely wise to the fact that Gretchen knew about Claire’s abilities, but was putting on a show as the clueless, sweet father.  While it can be fun not knowing how to read certain characters, being “in the know” for such acts can be just as enjoyable.</p>
<p>And, finally, we have the Peter portion of this week’s episode.  Again, I had one of those moments when I said to myself, “No, not Peter getting manipulated by somebody AGAIN.”  Between Nathan, his mother, his father, Adam, and just about anybody else who has the ability to smile and show him some affection, Peter’s been outwitted for practically the entire series (the lone exception, as best as I can tell, was the “Fugitives” volume).  But they handled it pretty well, all things considered, with Peter taking a strong stance in his belief that he was being scammed.  He was confident and sure, without those insecurities we saw over the first two seasons.  It wasn’t until he was provided “evidence” that would have convinced most anybody that he finally relented.  And even then, he handled things on his own terms.  He didn’t cry to his mother or run to his brother.  He faced up to what he had done and attempted to rectify it.  Yes, he was still manipulated.  But he wasn’t made out to look like a schmuck.</p>
<p>That being said, I really don’t have any interest in seeing Peter used as a pawn for evil deeds YET AGAIN.</p>
<p><strong>Matt Basilo has been writing for Inside Pulse since April 2005, providing his insight into popular television shows such as Lost, 24, Heroes, and Smallville. You can visit his blog at <a href="http://www.acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">[a case of the blog]</a>.</strong><br />
<topstory120x120>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory500x250>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/09/30/heroes-episode-4-2-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes &#8211; Episode 4-1 &amp; 4-2 Review</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/09/22/heroes-episode-4-1-4-2-review/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/09/22/heroes-episode-4-1-4-2-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Basilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=175985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long-time readers will know that I’ve been a very loyal Heroes apologist.  While everybody else has gone on and on about how the show is in critical condition and on the verge of cancelation, I’ve rightly noted that it’s still one of the highest rated shows on NBC (the network in, what, fourth place?) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long-time readers will know that I’ve been a very loyal <em>Heroes</em> apologist.  While everybody else has gone on and on about how the show is in critical condition and on the verge of cancelation, I’ve rightly noted that it’s still one of the highest rated shows on NBC (the network in, what, fourth place?) and brings in the most alluring demographics (which means money).  Yet I have to admit that I’ve been majorly frustrated with the previews I’ve read for the fourth season.  Nearly every single one has a cast member acknowledging that season three was a bit shaky, but that things are really going to pick up this season, with the heroes attempting to live normal lives.  I feel like I read the EXACT same thing last season.  And if last season failed to reach expectations – as the actors seem to acknowledge – then what assurances should I have for this upcoming season?</p>
<p>And truth be told, I didn’t even mind last season.  I thought it was a HUGE improvement over season two, particularly the &#8220;Fugitives&#8221; arc.  Part of me wishes the actors and producers would take the Matthew Fox/<em>Lost</em> approach, and basically just say, “No, the critics are wrong.  The show is still great.  You’ll see.”  And he was right.  A lot of fans argued that the third season of <em>Lost</em> was weak – I don’t agree – but ultimately, I believe, those same fans would agree that it paid off in the grand scheme of things.</p>
<p>There’s owning up to things and there’s taking ownership.  Last year those involved with <em>Heroes</em> rightly owned up to the previous season’s weaknesses.  This year I would have preferred they taken ownership of what was an adequate and acceptable season.  Did they capture that same magic we saw in season one?  No – but they never will.  So they shouldn’t even try.  Using <em>Lost</em> as an example again, the writers aren’t trying to recreate the first season (time travel comments aside), they’re instead progressing the story.  And that’s why I was partially disappointed to read that these characters are “going back” to living normal lives.  I don’t want them to “go back” to anything.  I want them to move forward – the one thing the show has constantly struggled to do.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, I have come into this premiere with a positive attitude.  Admittedly, I am more skeptical than I once was.  My greatest hope is that the writers will show some restraint, and the real, for me, will be whether Sylar appears.  And if he does, in what capacity.  Last season, I made the bold suggestion that they wait until the finale before we see him emerge from Nathan’s persona.  I doubt that’ll happen, but I’m curious to see what sort of self-control they show.</p>
<p>For what it’s worth, I suggest everybody <strong><a href="http://www.acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">check out my blog</a> </strong>later this week, as I’ll use the latest season of <em>True Blood </em>as the template <em>Heroes</em> should use.  But until then, here’s my review of the premiere.</p>
<p>Personally, I thought the episode worked, partially because they didn’t attempt to outdo themselves.  Yes, they’ve lost a lot of their audience, but hopefully they’ve come to the conclusion that people that still watch are going to watch pretty much no matter what.  <em>24</em> has a similar mentality.  They no longer have to “screw the pooch” in the premiere in order to ensure that they have an audience for the rest of the season.  This was a fine set of episodes that told properly told us where the characters are and gave us a hint of where they’ll be going.</p>
<p>And I think what made the episode really successful was the strong focus on HRG.  I’m very grateful that they kicked the season off with him and Claire on good terms, and drifted away from any indication that there could be trust issues between them.  In fact, they seemed almost at peace with each other, both understanding what the other had to do to live their life.  Their interaction, as it almost always is, was genuinely sweet.  And I know a lot of people don’t like Claire, but I find her adorable.  Oh, and it<br />
was also beyond great seeing him and the Haitian working together again.</p>
<p>For that matter, I thought his budding relationship with Tracy – one of the weakest characters on the show – was fantastic.  It actually made me like her character, whereas I beyond rolled my eyes when it was revealed that she survived in last year’s finale.  I enjoy their mutual quest for redemption, and I just hope that the writers resist the urge to have one of them turn their back on this mission.</p>
<p>I always love the interactions between HRG and Peter.  Ever since their “call me Noah” moment, it just seems like these two have a special bond.  And it made total sense to me that Peter would be the person he would go to for back up.  Even when they are seemingly on opposite sides – as they were for part of the Fugitives arc – there still seems to be a certain amount of trust between them.</p>
<p>Well, as you can see, Sylar was in this episode.  And quite a lot.  So far I’m cautiously accepting the way they’ve gone about it, with him being (for all we know) hallucinations shared by Parkman and Angela.  And, if handled correctly, the idea of Nathan living in Sylar’s body, while Sylar’s living in Parkman’s body, could be very interesting.</p>
<p>But actually, my bigger complaint is with Nathan.  I thought they laid on his identity crisis far too thickly.  I would have preferred seeing him live his life normally, and having little things occur (like him reaching for his glass and it gliding towards him, unbeknownst to him) that might make him raise an eyebrow.  But when he says stuff like, “it’s almost like my past is not my own,” it feels like a kindergartener is writing the show.  And it doesn’t exactly make it seem like they think their audience is very intelligent.</p>
<p>I enjoyed the new carnival characters, however I can’t help but have that sinking feeling that we’ll see the same old thing happen:  They’ll introduce new characters that are really fun and exciting – a great refresher from some of the bland original characters – only for them to be killed off.  And see all of the original players survive.</p>
<p>One thing that did slightly disappoint me, though, was that they had Hiro successfully change the past.  Purposely or not – and I suspect not – all of Hiro’s attempts at changing the past have failed.  The result might have changed, but the event itself still occurred.  Case in point:  the first season finale.  The explosion still occurred, Nathan just prevented it from killing all of those innocent people.  Although I guess one might argue the same thing happened here.  The event literally still took place, as the slushy did get knocked into the air, only this time adult Hiro took the ice, instead of his young sister.  With that in mind, I guess I’m not even disappointed.</p>
<p>But haven’t we all had just about enough of Hiro going back in time and changing stuff?   And does anybody else find it odd that he could be convinced to go back in time to save his sister’s dress, but couldn’t be talked into saving his own father’s life?</p>
<p><strong>Matt Basilo has been writing for Inside Pulse since April 2005, providing his insight into popular television shows such as Lost, Heroes, and Smallville. You can visit his blog at <a href="http://www.acaseoftheblog.blogspot.com/">[a case of the blog]</a>.</strong><br />
<topstory120x120>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory500x250>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/09/22/heroes-episode-4-1-4-2-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Fall TV Season Preview: Thoughts on New Shows and Season In General</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/09/22/2009-fall-tv-season-preview-thoughts-on-new-shows-and-season-in-general/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/09/22/2009-fall-tv-season-preview-thoughts-on-new-shows-and-season-in-general/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Clinton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[90210]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSI: Miami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSI: New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dancing with the Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desperate Housewives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Guy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Night Lights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gossip Girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grey's Anatomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How I Met Your Mother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Tree Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psych]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pushing Daisies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smallville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[So You Think You Can Dance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supernatural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survivor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Amazing Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True Blood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ugly Betty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E.R.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Name is Earl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The O.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.insidepulse.com/?p=175974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fall TV Season officially kicks off tonight, Monday, September 21, and that means all your favorite shows should be returning. If not, they will in January, unless they were canceled of course. But the new Fall season also means plenty of new shows that probably won&#8217;t last a season. With that in mind, a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fall TV Season officially kicks off tonight, Monday, September 21, and that means all your favorite shows should be returning. If not, they will in January, unless they were canceled of course. But the new Fall season also means plenty of new shows that probably won&#8217;t last a season. With that in mind, a few of the Inside Pulse TV writers gave me their thoughts about all the new shows this season and the Fall season&#8217;s lineup in general. Here is what they had to say, and also what I think as well:</p>
<hr />
<p><center><b><u>Joe Corey</u></b><center></p>
<p>The Fall TV season is almost here and once more we get to see if the major broadcast networks can create shows that rival their cable siblings. Is anything as anticipated as this summer’s <i>True Blood</i>, <i>Nurse Jackie</i>, <i>Mad Men</i> or <i>Ice Road Truckers</i>? Not really. This is shaping up to be a season where the networks play it safe.</p>
<p>Sunday night has only two new programs for your approval. Fox gives us <i>The Cleveland Show</i>. The black pal of <i>Family Guy</i>’s Peter Griffin gets spun off with a new wife and her old kids. This means Seth McFarlane now controls Fox’s Sunday night after <i>The Simpsons</i>. I’m not even giving odds of the show’s survival simply because <i>American Dad</i> lasted more than 6 episodes. Why couldn’t they have given Quagmire his own show? Or is that going to be saved for a pay-per-view special. CBS’ <i>Three Rivers</i> will attempt to harvest lost <i>E.R.</i> viewers with this tale of organ transplants. The medical drama features plenty of freshly scrubbed faces with stars Alex O&#8217;Loughlin (<i>Moonlight</i>), Alfre Woodard (<i>St. Elsewhere</i>) and Justina Machado (<i>Six Feet Under</i>). CBS better be patient since the show will get trounced against NFL football and <i>Desperate Housewives.</i></p>
<p>Monday Night is a combination of playing it safe and the big gamble. CBS shifts <i>The Big Bang Theory</i> back to 9:30 p.m. after <i>Two and a Half Men</i>. The replacement is <i> Accidentally on Purpose</i>. That titles seems to describe the fate of this show. Jenna Elfman (<i>Dharma and Greg</i>) gets knocked up by a younger putz. She decides to keep the baby and establish a relationship with the guy. What movie does this sound like? To make sure it doesn’t sound like <i>Knocked Up</i>, Elfman is a  movie critic for a newspaper instead of an E! employee. How long does she expect to keep her job? Newspaper film critics are getting fired at an alarming rate. That poor baby is going to starve to death. The show just doesn’t feel like it’s going to do well after <i>How I Met Your Mother</i>. At the same time, <i>The Big Bang Theory</i> looks to be a major hit in its new timeslot. <i>Rules of Engagement</i> will have this slot by mid-season. NBC gives us the first of their two new medical shows with <i>Trauma</i>. Forget the <i>E.R.</i>, here’s the Trauma medics. The show is from the folks who brought you <i>Friday Night Lights</i>. Expect to see this listed on upcoming “Save These Shows” web columns. But this isn’t the big gamble of the night for the Peacock Network. <i>The Jay Leno Show</i> is going to be the major wildcard. A few seasons back, the network gave up on Saturdays by making it a dumping ground for reruns and canceled shows that have episodes to burn. Now NBC has given up on the 10 p.m. slot when it comes to original programming. The network that gives us four hours of <i>The Today Show</i> will now give us three and a half hours of talkshows by moving Jay Leno up 90 minutes. Financially this move makes complete sense. Leno has made hundreds of millions of dollars from behind the desk. Why abandon the guy or let him take his schtick and audience to another network? However this entire move might completely backfire for Conan O’Brien. He’s already losing to Letterman in total viewers. Dave’s reruns beat fresh Conan during a two week period. The return of Leno might mean that his old fans will watch the 10 p.m. show, catch the first half of the 11 o’clock news up to tomorrow’s weather and go to bed. From 10 p.m. to 1 a.m., NBC is nothing, but people staring at the camera and talking. It’s almost like they’re programming a news channel instead of an entertainment network. Ultimately this is revolutionary move will be great for Leno, a cancer to Conan and hopefully a swift death for Jimmy Fallon and Carson Daly. </p>
<p>Tuesdays have plenty of new sights. ABC’s <i>Shark Tank</i> is kinda new having been started this summer. Do we really need to see people begging for their new mousetraps to be loved? When they eliminate an inventor, you kinda fear they’ll commit suicide since they’ve staked everything on their gadget salvation. This is like Discovery’s <i>Pitchmen</I> without the joy of the late Billy Mays. <i>The Forgotten</i> might be a really bad name for a TV show. Remember to watch <i>The Forgotten</i>! The show is about amateur sleuths investigating John and Jane Does. It stars Christian Slater who had a major bust last season for NBC. Now that show was forgotten. CBS plays it safe by greenlighting <i>NCIS: Los Angeles.</i> The show has the biggest star power of the Fall with L.L. Cool J and Chris O’Donnell in the spin-off leads. <i>The Good Wife</i> gives us <i>E.R.</i> Juliana Margulies and <i>Law and Order</i>’s Chris Noth in a tale of a corrupt politician and a wife getting back in the work force. The show’s summary is longer than a Jackie Collins novel. It might make it to thirteen episodes. CW’s <i>Melrose Place</i> will revive the apartment based series with Ashlee Simpson in the lead. Can’t wait for her to look like the star of a Godzilla flick with her words not matching the lips. Laura Leighton and Thomas Calabro from the original will pop in to make the new tenants feel the original’s heat. When will they revive <i>Models Inc</i>?</p>
<p>Wednesday Night has tons of new shows except on CBS which is keeping the old guard. ABC is all new starting with <i>Hank</i> starring Kelsey Grammer. Now that’s going to confuse people who think he’s supposed to be the real life version of Hank Hill from <i>King of the Hill</i>. Kelsey is a Wall Street executive who has to move out to the sticks when the market fails. I hate it when guys with mansions in Hawaii play poor people. This will die as fast as his Fox series. <i>The Middle</i> looks to be more quirky than a show on ABC needs to be. <i>Modern Family</i> has a few laughs as Al Bundy attempts to stay hip with the kids. This might make it through the season. <i>Cougar Town</i> has Courtney Cox on the prowl for fresh meat. Expect to see her <i>Friends</i> friends make guest appearances to pop the ratings. <i>Eastwick</i> will attempt to turn <i>The Witches of Eastwick</i> into the second coming of <i>Charmed</i>. This might be Jay Leno’s first victim. CW’s <i>The Beautiful Life: TBL</i> is Ashton Kutcher version of <i>Models Inc</i>! <i>TBL</i> does sound like the latest faux illness used to sell drugs on TV. It revives the career of <i>The O.C</i>.&#8217;s Mischa Barton so the negative coverage from Perez will make it a minor hit. Fox’s <i>Glee</i> had a great pilot debut last season after <i>American Idol</i>. It has the best chance to be the teen hit. NBC’s <i>Mercy</i> is a nurse show that appears to be a nicer version of <i>Nurse Jackie</i>. It’s going to need CPR in 4 weeks.</p>
<p>Thursdays Nights will feature a show that gives us a reason to love and hate at the same time in NBC’s <i>Community</i>. The series is a showcase for <i>The Soup</i>’s Joel McHale. Finally he gets a network time to shine. The bad news is they force us to watch Chevy Chase. Remember the last time you found Chevy Chase funny? And was he funny when your legally prescribed painkillers wore off? ABC’s <i>FlashForward</i> plays like a mini-series about everyone on the Earth passing out for 2 minutes and 17 seconds. What happened to us? Do we really need five years to get a solution? CW’s <i>Vampire Diaries</i> will be <i>True Blood</i> for people who don’t like nudity in their undead encounters.</p>
<p>Friday has only one new show with <i>Brothers</i>. After sitting behind the Fox Football desk, Michael Strahan is now a thespian. Luckily the producers landed him a good supporting team in Carl Weathers, Darryl “Chill” Mitchell and CCH Pounder. The show might actually survive because CW has completely gotten out of programming for people who enjoy Tyler Perry projects. </p>
<p>Saturday Night is a pit. The networks are either running college football or reruns of the shows from the week. Break out your wii if you want to be entertained by your TV.</p>
<p>The only predictable hits from the freshmen class should be <i>Glee, Brothers</i> and <i>NCSI: Los Angeles</i>. The shows that won’t survive October include <i>Accidentally on Purpose</i>, the hospital shows and ABC’s Wednesday night line up.</p>
<hr />
<p><center><b><u>Sharon Tharp</u></b><center></p>
<p>ABC has some heavy hitters with <i>Grey’s Anatomy</i>, <i>Dancing with the Stars</i>, <i>Brothers and Sisters</i>, <i>Desperate Housewives</i> and <i>Lost</i>. I am excited and a little bit scared to see how <i>Scrubs</i> does since we’ve technically already had a series finale. The network did rid itself of a few lingering shows, but I was somewhat surprised when <i>Samantha Who?</i> and <i>Pushing Daisies</i> got the boot. <i>Ugly Betty</i>’s luster seems to be dwindling, and I’m not sure how much longer it will hold up on that weak Friday night timeslot. As for the seemingly boring Wednesday night (on all networks across the board), ABC’s new <i>Cougartown</i> may push through.</p>
<p>CBS seems to be holding up well with its <i>CSI</i> franchise, reality big wigs like <i>Survivor</i> (which boggles me as to why people still tune in) and the network’s ever-lovable comedies <i>Two and a Half Men</i> and <i>How I Met you Mother</i>—the staple of humor on Monday nights. As for the rest of the shows, I’ve never really bothered to watch, and I’ve honestly never watched a single episode of the ones that were canceled, so no biggie.</p>
<p>Sure, Fox has canceled <i>King of the Hill</i>, one of its three highly successful animated shows, but with <i>American Idol</i> losing Paula this upcoming season, I’m sure ratings will sky-rocket as the dynamic changes. <i>Fringe</i> is back on, which isn’t surprising as it brought in good numbers in its premiere season, but I’m a little worried about it’s new time at the ridiculously competitive 9 p.m. Thursday. Meanwhile, <i>House</i> still holds up the network’s medical drama quota nicely. The network did cancel two shows with a fairly decent following—<i>Prison Break</i> and <i>Terminator: The Chronicles of Sarah Connor</i>, but I’m not even sure how much they will  be missed anyway.</p>
<p>I would argue NBC has the best comedic lineup on television right now with <i>The Office</i> and <i>30 Rock</i> holding up strong. As far as the ever-competitive Thursdays go, NBC and ABC are the strongest by far. <i>Heroes</i> and <i>Friday Night Lights</i> are still hanging in there, while newbie Southland has seemed to catch on. The biggest shocker was the cancellation of <i>My Name is Earl</i>, despite its popularity and cast pleas to stay on-air.</p>
<p>The CW struck gold last season with the <i>90210</i> remake and I can bet the new <i>Melrose Place</i> will easily follow. <i>Gossip Girl</i>’s numbers aren’t the best and the network is trying to hang on tight by switching time slots with the stronger <i>One Tree Hill</i>, which was renewed much to the surprise of fans as Chad Michael Murray and Hilarie Burton called it quits. And of course, <i>America’s Next Top Model</i>, <i>Smallville</i> and <i>Supernatural</i> all hang in with decent viewership. <i>Privileged</i> seemed to catch a following, but didn’t make the cut.</p>
<p><b>NEW SHOW THOUGHTS</b>:</p>
<p>*Shows I will probably check out<br />
# Shows I wouldn’t waste time watching</p>
<p><b><u>Yay (most potential)</u></b></p>
<p><i>Melrose Place (The CW)</i><br />
After seeing the popularity of the new <i>90210</i>, this remake will also take off by capturing those same viewers. And I can guarantee it won’t have anything to do with Ashlee Simpson’s stellar acting abilities. *</p>
<p><i>The Vampire Diaries (The CW)</i><br />
Let’s be honest, this show will make it based on genre alone. The <i>Twilight Saga</i> is a hit. <i>True Blood</i> is a hit. Even if the storylines are lacking, history has taught us hot vampires always win out in the end.</p>
<p><i>The Jay Leno Show (NBC)</i><br />
People will tune in to see how Jay holds up without <i>The Tonight Show</i>. I’m rooting for him frankly because some of late night television is dwindling (cough cough Jimmy Fallon and Carson Daly cough cough). *</p>
<p><i>NCIS (CBS)</i><br />
With the crime scene show popularity, it seems like a shoe-in—especially with the original <i>NCIS</i> as its lead-in on Tuesday nights. Besides Dancing with the Stars, the show doesn’t have too much competition either.</p>
<p><i>Cougartown (ABC)</i><br />
Come on now, the fascination our society has with cougars and MILFs…I’m pretty sure Courtney Cox won’t have trouble bringing in viewers. *</p>
<p><i>Flash Forward (ABC)</i><br />
Interesting concept and lined up on Thursday night right before <i>Grey’s Anatomy</i>. It could work as long as the translation from print to television isn’t lost.</p>
<p><i>Three Rivers (CBS)</i><br />
A medical drama that looks more into the lives of organ donors. It’s a new angle and airs on Sundays, which of course is where <i>Grey</i>’s started. It all depends on those <i>Desperate Housewives</i> fans.</p>
<p><i>Community (NBC)</i><br />
With The Office as its lead-in and <i>Arrested Development</i> directors involved, the show has a lot of potential. The story seems quirky and fresh, but how will it hold up against that brutal Thursday night competition? * </p>
<p><i>Accidentally on Purpose (CBS)</i><br />
I think it’s dependent on the longevity factor—does the story warrant more than a few episodes worth of humor? Sandwiched in between <i>How I Met Your Mother</i> and <i>Two and a Half Men</i>, it definitely has the potential to stick. *</p>
<p><b><u>Es posible (possible potential)</u></b></p>
<p><i>Shark Tank (ABC)</i><br />
The only power I see behind this show is the mind behind it. While Mark Burnett has found hits in <i>Survivor</i> and <i>The Apprentice</i>, I give it one season, maybe less. This kind of stuff tends to get old fast. #</p>
<p><i>The Forgotten (ABC)</i><br />
With <i>Dancing with the Stars</i> as its lead-in, this Jerry Bruckheimer-produced crime show will probably draw in a decent amount of viewers. Other than Jay Leno, I don’t see much competition, but I’m not sure it will last.</p>
<p><i>Mercy (NBC)</i><br />
Another medical drama hits primetime and as with all shows of the genre, staying power is equal to not only the writing, but the casting. As evident by other medical hits, the ensemble cast can make or break the show.</p>
<p><i>The Cleveland Show (FOX)</i><br />
A good animated series can go far and with <i>King of the Hill</i> gone, it may have a fighting chance.</p>
<p><i>Trauma (NBC)</i><br />
NBC must really want us to stop watching other networks’ medical dramas. Airing after <i>Heroes</i> could be its saving grace, but what <i>Heroes</i> fans would even watch this?</p>
<p><i>Hank (ABC)</i><br />
<i>Frasier</i> fans will probably tune in on an otherwise boring night of television, but the actual concept of the show is still lost on me.</p>
<p><i>Modern Family (ABC)</i><br />
<i>The Office</i>-like mockumentary style could help this otherwise seemingly average family  comedy.</p>
<p><b><u>Nay (slim potential)</u></b></p>
<p><i>The Beautiful Life (The CW)</i><br />
Mischa Barton….really? She’s a mess and not the best actress. People will tune in because it’s another Ashton Kutcher production, but as for staying power, I predict none. #</p>
<p><i>Eastwick (ABC)</i><br />
Supernatural shows are either a hit or a miss, I doubt this will make it to season 2. <i>Eli Stone</i> was cancelled and I think some people actually watched that.</p>
<p><i>Brothers (FOX)</i><br />
Could draw in some sports fans who are bored on Friday nights, but I think I’d rather be at the bar. #</p>
<p><i>The Middle (ABC)</i><br />
Another half-hour comedy for ABC. Sounds like it will be a watered-down version of Malcolm in the Middle with a boring mother as its center. Yawn.</p>
<p><i>The Good Wife (CBS)</i><br />
A scandal surrounding a public official because we’ve never seen that before. Though, it could see a second season thanks to the over-promotion and lack of competition on Tuesday nights.</p>
<p><i>V (ABC)</i><br />
Ugh, I’d much rather tune into Fox’s Fringe.</p>
<hr />
<p><center><b><u>Kevin Wong</u></b><center></p>
<p><b><i>Jay Leno Show</i></b> -</p>
<p>What&#8217;s better than having an hour a day dedicated to reality TV?  Apparently, an hour a day devoted to Jay Leno.  We&#8217;ll never be rid of him, and now we&#8217;ll be subjected to his dated jokes at an earlier hour.  Yay!</p>
<p><b><i>Shark Tank</i></b> -</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not entirely sure why British/Canadian show <i>Dragon&#8217;s Den</i> needed to be renamed, but it was, with a bit of the Burnett flair we&#8217;ve come to expect from his shows.  The show is actually a great idea, but what works in England and Canada has thus far not given the excitment and sensationalism that American audiences have come to expect from their reality shows.  I&#8217;d expect that this show will work well in the summer months, but will die quickly during the regular season.</p>
<p><b><i>Accidentally on Purpose</i></b> -</p>
<p>Jenna Elfman can bring the funny, and if you&#8217;ve seen <i>Extras</i>, you know that Ashley Jensen can play the sidekick perfectly.  But everyone else is a wild card when it comes to comedy.  But since CBS is confident enough in the show to place it in the Monday sitcom block, I expect that it will stick around at least for the year.</p>
<p><b><i>Mercy</i></b> -</p>
<p>Will Michelle Trachtenberg, Kate Mulgrew and Delroy freaking Lindo be enough to make <i>not E.R.</i> a hit?  Probably not &#8211; I think that most people would consider this to be something of a reboot for <i>E.R.</i>, and won&#8217;t bother to watch.</p>
<p><b><i>Trauma</i></b> -</p>
<p>Remember <i>Third Watch</i>?  It got transplanted to San Francisco.  This seems like a Perfectly Acceptable Show, but it&#8217;ll probably need to garner a following to survive. </p>
<p><b><i>N.C.I.S.: Los Angeles</i></b> -</p>
<p>When NBC cancelled <i>JAG</i>, they probably didn&#8217;t anticipate the show lasting 9 more seasons, AND creating two spinoffs in <i>NCIS</i> and the creatively named <I>NCIS: Los Angeles</i>.  This show essentially replaces <i>Without a Trace</i> in CBS&#8217; ginormous lineup of procedurals, and I expect that it will do well, simply because of it&#8217;s connection to <i>NCIS</i>.</p>
<p><b><i>The Forgotten</i></b> -</p>
<p>This show has the advantage of being a Bruckheimer production, but the disadvantage of NOT being on CBS.  I don&#8217;t see this lasting long.</p>
<p><b><i>The Good Wife</i></b> -</p>
<p>The show has some good actors in place, but this seems like it&#8217;ll be doomed like The Ex-List.  But to be honest, I don&#8217;t really go for this sort of show.</p>
<p><b><i>Melrose Place</i></b> -</p>
<p>Two things they&#8217;ve done right with this show so far &#8211; Michael Mancini and Sydney Andrews.  But if 90210 is any indication, it&#8217;s downhill from there.  I&#8217;d make a joke about <i>Models, Inc</i> being next on the remake list, but they already have <i>America&#8217;s Next Top Model</i>.  Close enough.</p>
<p><b><i>Hank</i></b> -</p>
<p>Did they come up with this title after watching Kelsey Grammer&#8217;s portrayal of Beast in <i>X-Men: The Last Stand</i>?  Or is someone simply an <i>X-Men</i> fan?  The fact that the daughter is named &#8220;Maddie Pryor&#8221; would seem to indicate so.  Looks like your usual &#8220;fish out of water&#8221; sitcom.  We know Grammer has done that before, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s enough to keep this show around.</p>
<p><b><i>The Middle</i></b> -</p>
<p>Curiously, Grammer&#8217;s <i>Back to You </i> co-star Patricia Heaton was also picked up for an ABC series.  I have about as much hope for it as well.</p>
<p><b><i>The Modern Family</i></b> -</p>
<p>And again linking to Kelsey Grammer is his <i>Frasier</i> producer, Christopher Lloyd with this <i>Office</i>-like show featuring Al Bundy.  Probably the best of the trio here.</p>
<p><b><i>Cougar Town</i></b> -</p>
<p>What&#8217;s with the obsession with cougars this fall season?  We&#8217;ve got Jenna Elfman, Laura Leighton and Courtney Cox all portraying cougars.  I suppose it&#8217;s better than having 40+ guys trying to hit on 20-something women though.  This probably goes about as well as <i>Swingtown</i>, or <i>Townies</i>, or White Town.</p>
<p><b><i>Eastwick</i></b> -</p>
<p><i>The Witches of Eastwick</i> gets a TV remake, hitching a ride on the latest supernatural wave headed by <i>Twilight</i>.  Not sure how this will do, as you&#8217;re essentially looking at a more serious version of <i>Charmed</i>.  I&#8217;d say it gets burned at the stake in short order.</p>
<p><b><i>Glee</i></b> -</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always hard to determine what shows Fox will stick with and what it will cancel.  Glee has been heavily pushed, and if the ratings don&#8217;t immediately match up to the push (especially with the show getting preempted for baseball in October), I could see it getting killed quickly.  On the other hand, it&#8217;s getting paired with the fall season debut of <i>So You Think You Can Dance</i>, a spiritual partner if there ever was one.</p>
<p><b><i>The Beautiful Life</i></b> -</p>
<p>I take back what I said about <i>America&#8217;s Next Top Model</i>.  THIS is clearly the successor to <i>Models Inc</i>.  And since it&#8217;s on the CW, it&#8217;ll survive.</p>
<p><b><i>Community</i></b> -</p>
<p>They dropped <i>My Name is Earl</i> for a sitcom about community college with the same &#8220;fish out of water&#8221; premise as <i>Hank</i>?  Really?  And you want it to anchor your Thurdsay comedy block?  Really?  Well, it&#8217;s safe to say that if it makes it that far (it&#8217;s set to debut in the 9:30pm slot) it&#8217;ll get obliterated by <i>Survivor</i> and probably <i>Flash Forward</i>.  Really.</p>
<p><b><i>Flash Forward</i></b> -</p>
<p>The executive producer team of Goyer, Braga and Guggenheim should mean that the quality of this show will be good.  But there is the danger that the show will be too &#8220;smart&#8221; for the average viewer &#8211; witness the demise of <i>Threshold</i>.  I don&#8217;t know that calling it the next <i>Lost</i> is necessarily a good thing &#8211; this would mean that seasons 2 and 3 will be giant clusters &#8211; but if it can generate that kind of buzz and maintain it throughout the fall, it&#8217;ll at least get to create those clusters.</p>
<p><b><i>The Vampire Diaries</i></b> -</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing that this is the safe-for-network-television version of <i>True Blood</i>, or something.  Or maybe <i>Twilight</i>.  They&#8217;re all based on books, so who the heck knows.  Who exactly decided to create teen romance books/movies/shows about vampires anyway?  Give me <i>Blade</i> any day of the week.</p>
<p><b><i>Brothers</i></b> -</p>
<p>I guess we&#8217;ll see what kind of acting chops Michael Strahan has.  But seeing as this is being placed on a Friday, my guess is &#8220;not enough to save this show&#8221;.  </p>
<p><b><i>Three Rivers</i></b> -</p>
<p>Not particularly enthused about this show, but anything on CBS that isn&#8217;t a crime procedural is a welcome change in my book.</p>
<p><b><i>The Cleveland Show</i></b> -</p>
<p>Anything from the mind of Seth Macfarlane is crap in my personal opinion, but even if you&#8217;re a fan of his shows, you have to worry that running three shows simultaneously (especially one that seems to invoke Russo booking like <i>Family Guy</i>) is going to lead to lesser quality overall.  It&#8217;ll last the season, because Fox really doesn&#8217;t have a choice.</p>
<p><b><i>V</i></b> -</p>
<p>Yet another remake of a cult show.  I was a bit too young in 1983 to really get into the original, but I think that the concept can catch on in 2009.  The showrunners previously helmed <i>The 4400</i>, so I fully expect some of those ideas to make their way into the ABC show.  Should be interesting to see if it survives.</p>
<hr />
<p><center><b><u>Josh Clinton</u></b><center></p>
<p><b><i>Jay Leno Show</i></b> -</p>
<p>NBC decided to save money by having Jay Leno move his show to 10 p.m. ET/PT.  That means they have 5 hours less original programming they need to fill each week. Will that be a success for them?  I predict the Jay Leno show will get decent ratings.  Possibly even better than Conan&#8217;s show, but how will the show compete against the other networks?</p>
<p><b><i>Shark Tank</i></b> -</p>
<p>A somewhat fresh idea for a reality show and it&#8217;s created by <i>Survivor</i> creator, Mark Burnett.  Sticks around for a full season, but next season?  Eh, probably not.</p>
<p><b><i>Accidentally on Purpose</i></b> -</p>
<p>This show got a good time slot between <i>How I Met Your Mother</i> and <i>Two and a Half Men</i>. So it has a shot to stick around. I will lean towards a second season.</p>
<p><b><i>Mercy</i></b> -</p>
<p>NBC has two new medical dramas this season, which they hope will replace <i>E.R.</i>  I see only one of them sticking around for another year. This one doesn&#8217;t look good since we have seen the hospital through the eyes of nurses before.</p>
<p><b><i>Trauma</i></b> -</p>
<p>This NBC drama looks better since it&#8217;s a fresh prospective from the paramedics view. Although, this will probably be similar to TNT&#8217;s short-lived <i>Saved</i> show. </p>
<p><b><i>N.C.I.S.: Los Angeles</i></b> -</p>
<p>It&#8217;s on CBS and it&#8217;s a spin-off of a successful franchise. And it follows the original show. This one will be around for a few years.</p>
<p><b><i>The Forgotten</i></b> -</p>
<p>This could go 50/50.  It stars Christian Slater. But it&#8217;s on ABC on Tuesday nights. It does follow Dancing with the Stars and it has no real competition. Could be around next year.</p>
<p><b><i>The Good Wife</i></b> -</p>
<p>In competition with The Forgotten. It&#8217;s on CBS so that gives them an edge, but Slater is a more interesting star than Julianna Margulies. So it could be around, but between the two I lean towards <i>The Forgotten</i>.</p>
<p><b><i>Melrose Place</i></b> -</p>
<p>It worked with 90210 on The CW, so why not again? This remake will probably not be that good, but it airs after 90210, so it should stick around.</p>
<p><b><i>Hank</i></b> -</p>
<p>One of 5 new shows for ABC on Wednesday nights. It stars Kelsey Grammer, but it sounds boring. See you later.</p>
<p><b><i>The Middle</i></b> -</p>
<p>See above.</p>
<p><b><i>The Modern Family</i></b> -</p>
<p>See above.  But if they need a new comedy to stick around, this one has the best chance over the two above. I mean Al Bundy is in it.</p>
<p><b><i>Cougar Town</i></b> -</p>
<p>This has the best chance of surviving out of all the new Wednesday shows. Timely premise and former <i>Friends</i> star, Courtney Cox.</p>
<p><b><i>Eastwick</i></b> -</p>
<p>Could stick around, if people stick around to see it. Not likely, but slight lean towards a second season.</p>
<p><b><i>Glee</i></b> -</p>
<p>Likely to develop a cult following. Good chance if FOX gives it one and it does have a good time slot.</p>
<p><b><i>The Beautiful Life</i></b> -</p>
<p>I loved <i>The O.C.</i>, but Mischa Barton is a train wreck and she will bring down this show so fast off of The CW.</p>
<p><b><i>Community</i></b> -</p>
<p>Getting big push with a good Thursday night time slot. Likely to be around.</p>
<p><b><i>Flash Forward</i></b> -</p>
<p>Getting the BIG Thursday night push from ABC. Been said to be the new <i>Lost</i>.  I say it will be around next year.</p>
<p><b><i>The Vampire Diaries</i></b> -</p>
<p><i>Twilight</i> has made everyone vampire crazy, so this one will probably be around.</p>
<p><b><i>Brothers</i></b> -</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an interesting idea that stars former NFL star, Michael Strahan.  But it&#8217;s Friday night. Doubtful, but it&#8217;s FOX Friday night. Who care?</p>
<p><b><i>Three Rivers</i></b> -</p>
<p>Another medical drama, but this one is on CBS.  I can see it go either way, but slight lean towards a new season.</p>
<p><b><i>The Cleveland Show</i></b> -</p>
<p><i>Family Guy</i> fans will probably save this one.  Besides FOX needs to fill a hole in its &#8220;Animated Domination&#8221; Sunday night lineup with <i>King of the Hill</i> gone now.</p>
<p><b><i>V</i></b> -</p>
<p>Another sci-fi series from ABC.  I say it won&#8217;t last. </p>
<hr />
<p>Stay tuned to Inside Pulse TV this season for complete reviews on all your favorite shows and maybe even some of the new ones as well.</p>
<p><topstory120x120> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/gossip-girl-logo.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory120x120> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/fnl3-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory120x120> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/key_art_ugly_betty-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory120x120> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-c&#8230;ves-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory120x120> http://media.insidepulse.com/zones/primetimepulse/uploads/2009/08/key_art_psych-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory120x120> http://media.insidepulse.com/zones/primetimepulse/uploads/2009/09/key_art_the_office-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory120x120> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/key_art_greys_anatomy-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory120x120> http://media.insidepulse.com/zones/realitydish/uploads/2009/08/survivor-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory120x120> http://media.insidepulse.com/zones/prime&#8230;era-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory120x120> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/csi-new-york1-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory120x120> http://media.insidepulse.com/zones/primetimepulse/uploads/2009/05/one_tree_hill_5_poster-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory120x120> http://media.insidepulse.com/zones/primetimepulse/uploads/2009/05/smallville1-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory120x120> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory120x120>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/5xnfo8j-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120><br />
<topstory500x250> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/gossipgirl.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory500x250> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/fnl3-500&#215;329.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory500x250> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/key_art_ugly_betty-500&#215;194.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory500x250> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-c&#8230;ves-500&#215;194.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory500x250> http://media.insidepulse.com/zones/primetimepulse/uploads/2009/08/key_art_psych-500&#215;194.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory500x250> http://media.insidepulse.com/zones/primetimepulse/uploads/2009/09/key_art_the_office-500&#215;194.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory500x250> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/key_art_greys_anatomy-500&#215;194.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory500x250> http://media.insidepulse.com/zones/realitydish/uploads/2009/08/survivor-500&#215;325.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory500x250> http://media.insidepulse.com/zones/primetimepulse/uploads/2009/09/mad-men-season-3-postera.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory500x250> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/csi-new-york1-500&#215;400.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory500x250> http://media.insidepulse.com/zones/primetimepulse/uploads/2009/05/one_tree_hill_5_poster-500&#215;501.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory500x250> http://media.insidepulse.com/zones/primetimepulse/uploads/2009/05/smallville1-500&#215;375.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory500x250> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory500x250>http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/5xnfo8j-500&#215;344.jpg</topstory500x250></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/09/22/2009-fall-tv-season-preview-thoughts-on-new-shows-and-season-in-general/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glee&#8217;s Jayma Mays To Return As Guest Star on Heroes</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/08/31/glees-jayma-mays-to-return-as-guest-star-on-heroes/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/08/31/glees-jayma-mays-to-return-as-guest-star-on-heroes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Clinton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://primetimepulse.com/?p=77059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a love story, it&#8217;s not quite &#8220;The Time Traveler&#8217;s Wife.&#8221; But the time-traveler&#8217;s crush is returning to &#8220;Heroes.&#8221;
NBC confirms that Jayma Mays, who played Charlie, the object of Hiro&#8217;s (Masi Oka) affection in the first season of Heroes, will reprise her role on the show this fall. Mays will also star in FOX&#8217;s Glee [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a love story, it&#8217;s not quite &#8220;The Time Traveler&#8217;s Wife.&#8221; But the time-traveler&#8217;s crush is returning to &#8220;Heroes.&#8221;</p>
<p>NBC confirms that Jayma Mays, who played Charlie, the object of Hiro&#8217;s (Masi Oka) affection in the first season of <i>Heroes</i>, will reprise her role on the show this fall. Mays will also star in FOX&#8217;s <i>Glee</i> this fall, but as that show has already finished shooting its initial 13 episodes, she can get away to shoot <i>Heroes</i> as well.</p>
<p>NBC says the episode featuring Mays&#8217; character will likely air in November. </p>
<p><i><b>Source:</b>  Zap2It</i></p>
<p><topstory500x250> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory120x120> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/08/31/glees-jayma-mays-to-return-as-guest-star-on-heroes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ernie Hudson To Guest Star On Heroes This Season</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/08/12/ernie-hudson-to-guest-star-on-heroes-this-season/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/08/12/ernie-hudson-to-guest-star-on-heroes-this-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Clinton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://primetimepulse.com/?p=76928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oz and Ghostbusters actor Ernie Hudson will have a recurring role as a police officer on the upcoming season of Heroes.
Captain Lubbock (Hudson) is a Baltimore detective who&#8217;s hunting some of the characters on the show. 
Source:  Zap2It
 http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg
 http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Oz</i> and <i>Ghostbusters</i> actor Ernie Hudson will have a recurring role as a police officer on the upcoming season of <i>Heroes</i>.</p>
<p>Captain Lubbock (Hudson) is a Baltimore detective who&#8217;s hunting some of the characters on the show. </p>
<p><i><b>Source:</b>  Zap2It</i></p>
<p><topstory500x250> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory120x120> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/08/12/ernie-hudson-to-guest-star-on-heroes-this-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News and Notes From the Heroes Comic-Con Panel</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/08/04/news-and-notes-from-the-heroes-comic-con-panel/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/08/04/news-and-notes-from-the-heroes-comic-con-panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Clinton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://primetimepulse.com/?p=76826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the highlights of the Heroes Comic-Con panel:
- Zachary Quinto said this about one of his favorite scenes from the upcoming season. &#8220;I got to work with a baby. It was really fun. The baby was really good at crying.&#8221;
-The &#8220;exclusive first look at Redemption&#8221; included Peter Petrelli&#8217;s slow motion kung fu knife fight [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the highlights of the <i>Heroes</i> Comic-Con panel:</p>
<p>- Zachary Quinto said this about one of his favorite scenes from the upcoming season. &#8220;I got to work with a baby. It was really fun. The baby was really good at crying.&#8221;</p>
<p>-The &#8220;exclusive first look at Redemption&#8221; included Peter Petrelli&#8217;s slow motion kung fu knife fight with Hero Edgar (Ray Park), a carnival knife thrower.</p>
<p>- The new carnival stuff is explained by creator, TmKring, &#8220;We&#8217;re creating a new wrinkle in the mythology of the show. Alongside our Heroes, there was another group, this family who had powers, who could live among us and hide in plain sight.&#8221; </p>
<p>- A compass could play an important role in the show&#8217;s wrinkled mythology as well. </p>
<p>- Meanwhile, Claire goes to college and finds a &#8220;friend with privileges&#8221;, played by  Madeline Zima.</p>
<p>- Masi Oka said this about time travel. &#8220;We see time traveling a lot more [this season],&#8221; he said. &#8220;[Hiro's] redemption is going back in time and fixing things he&#8217;s done wrong. He has kind of a bucket list. He wants to make amends.&#8221; </p>
<p><i><b>Source:</b>  E! Online</i></p>
<p><topstory500x250> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-500&#215;319.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory120x120> http://tv.insidepulse.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/heroes-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/08/04/news-and-notes-from-the-heroes-comic-con-panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC Spreads Out Fall Premiere Schedule</title>
		<link>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/06/25/nbc-spreads-out-fall-premiere-schedule/</link>
		<comments>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/06/25/nbc-spreads-out-fall-premiere-schedule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Clinton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[30 Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://primetimepulse.com/?p=76555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NBC had already announced that The Jay Leno Show would premiere a week before the official start of the 2009-10 TV season. The network will take its time rolling out the rest of the fall schedule, though.
Leno&#8217;s prime-time show will premiere Monday, Sept. 14 and run every weeknight at 10 ET. Two other nights of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC had already announced that <i>The Jay Leno Show</i> would premiere a week before the official start of the 2009-10 TV season. The network will take its time rolling out the rest of the fall schedule, though.</p>
<p>Leno&#8217;s prime-time show will premiere Monday, Sept. 14 and run every weeknight at 10 ET. Two other nights of programming &#8212; <i>The Biggest Loser</i> on Tuesdays and the Thursday comedy block &#8212; will also debut that week, while the Monday, Wednesday and Friday shows will join them the week of Sept. 21, when Nielsen starts counting ratings for 2009-10.</p>
<p>The Thursday schedule will include, for three weeks, another round of <i>Saturday Night Live Weekend Update Thursday</i> at 8 p.m., followed by <i>Parks and Recreation</i>, <i>The Office</i> and newcomer <i>Community</i>. The latter show will shift to 8 o&#8217;clock on Oct. 8 to make room for an hour-long <i>Office</i>. Emmy winner <i>30 Rock</i> will join the party late again, debuting its fourth season on Oct. 15.</p>
<p>Also of note: <i>Heroes</i> will have a two-hour premiere on Monday, Sept. 21, which will push the debut of <i>Trauma</i> to Sept. 28. <i>Saturday Night Live</i> will kick off its season on Sept. 26.</p>
<p>The full rundown (all times Eastern):</p>
<p><b>Sunday, Sept. 13</b><br />
7 p.m. <i>Football Night in America</i> 8:15 p.m. <i>Sunday Night Football</i> (Chicago Bears at Green Bay Packers)</p>
<p><b>Monday, Sept. 14</b><br />
10 p.m. <i>The Jay Leno Show</i> (airs every weeknight)</p>
<p><b>Tuesday, Sept. 15</b><br />
8 p.m. <i>The Biggest Loser</i></p>
<p><b>Thursday, Sept. 17</b><br />
8 p.m. <i>Saturday Night Live Weekend Update Thursday</i> 8:30 p.m. <i>Parks and Recreation</i> 9 p.m. <i>The Office</i> 9:30 p.m. <i>Community</i></p>
<p><b>Monday, Sept. 21</b><br />
8 p.m. <i>Heroes</i> (two hours)</p>
<p><b>Wednesday, Sept. 23</b><br />
8 p.m. <i>Parenthood</i> 9 p.m. <i>Law &#038; Order: SVU</i></p>
<p><b>Friday, Sept. 25</b><br />
8 p.m. <i>Law &#038; Order</i> 9 p.m. <i>Southland</i></p>
<p><b>Saturday, Sept. 26</b><br />
8 p.m. <i>Dateline NBC</i> 11:30 p.m. <i>Saturday Night Live</i></p>
<p><b>Monday, Sept. 28</b><br />
9 p.m. <i>Trauma</i></p>
<p><b>Thursday, Oct. 8</b><br />
8 p.m. <i>Community</i> (new time period)</p>
<p><b>Thursday, Oct. 15</b><br />
9:30 p.m. <i>30 Rock</i></p>
<p><i><b>Source:</b>  Zap2It</i><br />
<topstory500x250>http://media.insidepulse.com/zones/primetimepulse/uploads/2009/05/large_nbc_logo_web-360&#215;375.jpg</topstory500x250><br />
<topstory120x120>http://media.insidepulse.com/zones/primetimepulse/uploads/2009/05/large_nbc_logo_web-120&#215;120.jpg</topstory120x120></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tv.insidepulse.com/2009/06/25/nbc-spreads-out-fall-premiere-schedule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
